Bill Text: TX SB2387 | 2019-2020 | 86th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: Relating to the regulatory analysis of rules proposed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-03-21 - Referred to Natural Resources & Economic Development [SB2387 Detail]

Download: Texas-2019-SB2387-Introduced.html
  86R7514 JAM-D
 
  By: Powell S.B. No. 2387
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the regulatory analysis of rules proposed by the Texas
  Commission on Environmental Quality.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 2001.0225(a), Government Code, is
  amended to read as follows:
         (a)  This section applies only to a major environmental rule
  adopted by a state agency other than the Texas Commission on
  Environmental Quality, the result of which is to:
               (1)  exceed a standard set by federal law, unless the
  rule is specifically required by state law;
               (2)  exceed an express requirement of state law, unless
  the rule is specifically required by federal law;
               (3)  exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or
  contract between the state and an agency or representative of the
  federal government to implement a state and federal program; or
               (4)  adopt a rule solely under the general powers of the
  agency instead of under a specific state law.
         SECTION 2.  Section 382.051961(b), Health and Safety Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (b)  The commission may not adopt a new permit by rule or a
  new standard permit or amend an existing permit by rule or an
  existing standard permit relating to a facility to which this
  section applies unless the commission:
               (1)  conducts a regulatory analysis as provided by
  Section 5.1032, Water [2001.0225, Government] Code;
               (2)  determines, based on the evaluation of credible
  air quality monitoring data, that the emissions limits or other
  emissions-related requirements of the permit are necessary to
  ensure that the intent of this chapter is not contravened,
  including the protection of the public's health and physical
  property;
               (3)  establishes any required emissions limits or other
  emissions-related requirements based on:
                     (A)  the evaluation of credible air quality
  monitoring data; and
                     (B)  credible air quality modeling that is not
  based on the worst-case scenario of emissions or other worst-case
  modeling scenarios unless the actual air quality monitoring data
  and evaluation of that data indicate that the worst-case scenario
  of emissions or other worst-case modeling scenarios yield modeling
  results that reflect the actual air quality monitoring data and
  evaluation; and
               (4)  considers whether the requirements of the permit
  should be imposed only on facilities that are located in a
  particular geographic region of the state.
         SECTION 3.  Subchapter D, Chapter 5, Water Code, is amended
  by adding Section 5.1032 to read as follows:
         Sec. 5.1032.  ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RULES. (a) In this
  section:
               (1)  "Cost" means a reasonably identifiable,
  significant, and direct or indirect negative economic effect.
               (2)  "Environmental benefit" means a reasonably
  identifiable, significant, and direct effect, including a
  quantifiable environmental, health, or economic effect, that is
  expected to result from regulation of the pollutant or pollutants
  targeted by an environmental rule.  The term does not include
  incidental co-benefits expected to result from the implementation
  of an environmental rule, including the reduction of pollutants
  already regulated by separate environmental rules.
               (3)  "Environmental rule" means a rule the specific
  intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to
  human health from environmental exposure.
               (4)  "Small business" means a business that employs not
  more than 250 individuals.
         (b)  Before adopting an environmental rule, the commission
  shall conduct a regulatory analysis that:
               (1)  identifies the problem the rule is intended to
  address;
               (2)  determines whether a new rule is necessary to
  address the problem; and
               (3)  considers the benefits and costs of the proposed
  rule in relationship to state agencies, local governments, the
  public, the regulated community, and the environment.
         (c)  When giving notice of an environmental rule, the
  commission shall incorporate into the fiscal note required by
  Section 2001.024, Government Code, a draft impact analysis
  describing the anticipated effects of the proposed rule. The draft
  impact analysis, at a minimum, must:
               (1)  identify the problem the rule is intended to
  address;
               (2)  identify the environmental benefits that the
  agency expects to result from implementation of and compliance with
  the rule, including the projected level of reduction of pollutants
  or contaminants in air, water, and soil media;
               (3)  identify and describe the costs that the agency
  expects that state agencies, local governments, the public, and the
  affected regulated entities, other than small businesses, will
  incur from implementation of and compliance with the rule; and
               (4)  identify and describe in a separate economic
  impact analysis the costs that the agency expects that small
  businesses will incur from implementation of and compliance with
  the rule.
         (d)  In identifying the environmental benefits of an
  environmental rule under Subsection (c)(2), the commission shall
  include the modeled improvement for the criteria pollutant design
  value expected from implementation of the rule, if the rule will be
  included in the state implementation plan under the federal Clean
  Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
         (e)  After considering public comments submitted under
  Section 2001.029, Government Code, and determining that a proposed
  environmental rule should be adopted, the commission shall prepare
  a final regulatory analysis that complies with Section 2001.033,
  Government Code.
         (f)  A person who submitted a comment in accordance with
  Section 2001.029, Government Code, may challenge the validity of an
  environmental rule that is not proposed and adopted in strict
  compliance with the procedural requirements of this section by
  filing an action for declaratory judgment as provided by Section
  2001.038, Government Code, not later than the 30th day after the
  effective date of the rule. If the court determines that an
  environmental rule was not proposed and adopted in strict
  compliance with the procedural requirements of this section, the
  rule is invalid.
         SECTION 4.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to an environmental rule proposed by the Texas Commission on
  Environmental Quality for which notice is given under Sections
  2001.023 and 2001.024, Government Code, on or after December 1,
  2019.
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.
feedback