Bill Text: AZ HB2519 | 2015 | Fifty-second Legislature 1st Regular | Chaptered
Bill Title: Relocation of child; parenting plans
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Passed) 2015-04-10 - Chapter 317 [HB2519 Detail]
Download: Arizona-2015-HB2519-Chaptered.html
|
Senate Engrossed House Bill |
|
State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session 2015
|
|
CHAPTER 317
|
|
HOUSE BILL 2519 |
|
|
AN ACT
amending sections 25‑403.02 and 25‑408, Arizona Revised Statutes; relating to legal decision‑making and parenting time.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 25-403.02, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
25-403.02. Parenting plans
A. If the child's parents cannot agree on a plan for legal decision‑making or parenting time, each parent must submit a proposed parenting plan.
B. Consistent with the child's best interests in section 25‑403 and sections 25‑403.03, 25‑403.04 and 25‑403.05, the court shall adopt a parenting plan that provides for both parents to share legal decision-making regarding their child and that maximizes their respective parenting time. The court shall not prefer a parent's proposed plan because of the parent's or child's gender.
C. Parenting plans shall include at least the following:
1. A designation of the legal decision-making as joint or sole as defined in section 25‑401.
2. Each parent's rights and responsibilities for the personal care of the child and for decisions in areas such as education, health care and religious training.
3. A practical schedule of parenting time for the child, including holidays and school vacations.
4. A procedure for the exchanges of the child, including location and responsibility for transportation.
5. A procedure by which proposed changes, relocation of where a child resides with either parent pursuant to section 25‑408, disputes and alleged breaches may be mediated or resolved, which may include the use of conciliation services or private counseling.
6. A procedure for periodic review of the plan's terms by the parents.
7. A procedure for communicating with each other about the child, including methods and frequency.
8. A statement that each party has read, understands and will abide by the notification requirements of section 25‑403.05, subsection B.
D. If the parents are unable to agree on any element to be included in a parenting plan, the court shall determine that element. The court may determine other factors that are necessary to promote and protect the emotional and physical health of the child.
E. Shared legal decision-making does not necessarily mean equal parenting time.
Sec. 2. Section 25-408, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
25-408. Rights of each parent; parenting time; relocation of child; exception; enforcement; access to prescription medication and records
A. If by written agreement or court order both parents are entitled to joint legal decision-making or unsupervised parenting time and both parents reside in the state, at least sixty forty‑five days' advance written notice shall be provided to the other parent before a parent may do either of the following:
1. Relocate the child outside the state.
2. Relocate the child more than one hundred miles within the state.
B. The notice required by this section shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, or pursuant to the Arizona rules of family law procedure. The court shall sanction a parent who, without good cause, does not comply with the notification requirements of this subsection. The court may impose a sanction that will affect legal decision-making or parenting time only in accordance with the child's best interests.
C. Within thirty days after notice is made the nonmoving parent may petition the court to prevent relocation of the child. After expiration of this time any petition or other application to prevent relocation of the child may be granted only on a showing of good cause. This subsection does not prohibit a parent who is seeking to relocate the child from petitioning the court for a hearing, on notice to the other parent, to determine the appropriateness of a relocation that may adversely affect the other parent's legal decision-making or parenting time rights.
D. Subsection A of this section does not apply if provision for relocation of a child has been made by a court order or a written agreement of the parties that is dated within one year of the proposed relocation of the child.
E. If a child is relocated pursuant to this section, unless otherwise ordered by the court, all parties must continue to comply with current court orders, regardless of distance moved or notice required.
E. F. Pending the determination by the court of a petition or application to prevent relocation of the child:
1. A parent with sole legal decision-making or a parent with joint legal decision-making and primary residence of a child who is required by circumstances of health or, safety or, employment or eviction of that parent or that parent's spouse to relocate in less than sixty forty‑five days after written notice has been given to the other parent may temporarily relocate with the child.
2. A parent who shares joint legal decision-making and substantially equal parenting time and who is required by circumstances of health or, safety or, employment or eviction of that parent or that parent's spouse to relocate in less than sixty forty‑five days after written notice has been given to the other parent may temporarily relocate with the child only if both parents execute a written agreement to permit relocation of the child.
F. G. The court shall determine whether to allow the parent to relocate the child in accordance with the child's best interests. The burden of proving what is in the child's best interests is on the parent who is seeking to relocate the child. To the extent practicable the court shall also make appropriate arrangements to ensure the continuation of a meaningful relationship between the child and both parents.
G. H. The court shall not deviate from a provision of any parenting plan or other written agreement by which the parents specifically have agreed to allow or prohibit relocation of the child unless the court finds that the provision is no longer in the child's best interests. There is a rebuttable presumption that a provision from any parenting plan or other written agreement is in the child's best interests.
H. I. In determining the child's best interests the court shall consider all relevant factors including:
1. The factors prescribed under section 25‑403.
2. Whether the relocation is being made or opposed in good faith and not to interfere with or to frustrate the relationship between the child and the other parent or the other parent's right of access to the child.
3. The prospective advantage of the move for improving the general quality of life for the custodial parent or for the child.
4. The likelihood that the parent with whom the child will reside after the relocation will comply with parenting time orders.
5. Whether the relocation will allow a realistic opportunity for parenting time with each parent.
6. The extent to which moving or not moving will affect the emotional, physical or developmental needs of the child.
7. The motives of the parents and the validity of the reasons given for moving or opposing the move including the extent to which either parent may intend to gain a financial advantage regarding continuing child support obligations.
8. The potential effect of relocation on the child's stability.
I. J. The court shall assess attorney fees and court costs against either parent if the court finds that the parent has unreasonably denied, restricted or interfered with court‑ordered parenting time.
J. K. Pursuant to section 25‑403.06, each parent is entitled to have access to prescription medication, documents and other information about the child unless the court finds that access would endanger seriously the child's or a parent's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR APRIL 10, 2015.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 14, 2015.
