Bill Text: AZ HB2692 | 2016 | Fifty-second Legislature 2nd Regular | Chaptered


Bill Title: Insurance; pharmacy benefits; audit procedures

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Passed) 2016-05-17 - Chapter 303 [HB2692 Detail]

Download: Arizona-2016-HB2692-Chaptered.html

 

 

House Engrossed

 

 

 

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-second Legislature

Second Regular Session

2016

 

 

 

CHAPTER 303

 

HOUSE BILL 2692

 

 

AN ACT

 

Amending title 20, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding chapter 25; relating to pharmacy benefits.

 

 

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

 


Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1.  Title 20, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 25, to read:

CHAPTER 25

PHARMACY BENEFITS

ARTICLE 1.  AUDITING

START_STATUTE20-3321.  Definitions

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1.  "Auditing entity" means any person, company, group or plan working on behalf of or pursuant to a contract with an insurer or pharmacy benefits manager for the purposes of auditing pharmacy drug claims adjudicated by pharmacies.

2.  "Clerical errors" means a minor recordkeeping or transcribing error, including typographical errors, scrivner's errors or computer errors, in a required electronic or hard copy document, record or prescription order if both of the following criteria are met:

(a)  The error did not result in actual financial harm to an entity.

(b)  The error did not involve dispensing an incorrect dose or type of medication or dispensing a prescription drug to the wrong person.

3.  "Desktop audit" means an audit that is conducted by an auditing entity at a location other than the location of the pharmacist or pharmacy. Desktop audit includes an audit that is performed at the offices of the auditing entity during which the pharmacist or pharmacy provides requested documents for review by hard copy or by microfiche, disk or other electronic media.

4.  "In‑pharmacy audit" means an audit that is conducted by an auditing entity at the physical business address of the pharmacy where the claim was adjudicated.

5.  "Insurer" means a disability insurer, group disability insurer, blanket disability insurer, health care services organization, hospital service corporation, medical service corporation or hospital and medical service corporation.

6.  "Pharmacist" has the same meaning prescribed in section 321901.

7.  "Pharmacy" has the same meaning prescribed in section 321901.

8.  "Pharmacy benefits manager" means a person, business or other entity that, pursuant to a contract or under an employment relationship with a carrier or other third-party payer, either directly or through an intermediary manages the prescription drug coverage provided by the carrier or other third-party payer, including the processing and payment of claims for prescription drugs, the performance of drug utilization review, the processing of drug prior authorization requests, the adjudication of appeals or grievances related to prescription drug coverage, contracting with network pharmacies and controlling the cost of covered prescription drugs. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE20-3322.  Audit procedures; interest prohibition

A.  The following procedures apply to an audit conducted by an auditing entity:

1.  When conducting an in‑pharmacy audit an auditing entity shall:

(a)  Give a pharmacy at least fourteen days' written notice.

(b)  Not conduct an audit during the first five days of the month unless the pharmacy otherwise consents.

(c)  Provide the pharmacy a list of items to be audited that provides for identification of prescription number or numbers or date range that the auditing entity is seeking to audit.

(d)  When conducting an in-pharmacy or desktop audit, limit the audit to claims that may not exceed two years from the date that the claim was adjudicated by the pharmacy benefits manager.

2.  An in‑pharmacy audit or desktop audit that involves clinical or professional judgment shall be conducted by or in consultation with a pharmacist.

3.  The pharmacy may use the records of a hospital, physician or other authorized practitioner to validate the pharmacy records.  The validated records may be obtained via electronic methods, fax, phone or written prescription orders and do not have to be the original hard copy prescription order.

4.  Each pharmacy shall be audited under the same standards and parameters as other similarly situated pharmacies in this state.

B.  When conducting an in‑pharmacy audit or desktop audit, an auditing entity shall comply with the following requirements:

1.  The auditing entity shall base a finding of overpayment or underpayment on the actual overpayment or underpayment and not on a projection based on the number of patients served who have similar diagnoses or on the number of similar orders or refills for similar drugs, unless required by federal or state law.

2.  The auditing entity may not recoup monies from the pharmacy for any clerical errors identified in an audit.

3.  Any finding of an overpayment may not include the dispensing fee amount unless any of the following criteria are met:

(a)  A prescription was not received by the patient or the patient's designee.

(b)  The prescriber denied authorization.

(c)  The prescription dispensed was a medication error by the pharmacy.

(d)  The identified overpayment is based solely on an extra dispensing fee.

C.  Interest may not accrue during the audit period. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE20-3323.  Audit reports

A.  The auditing entity must deliver a preliminary audit report to the pharmacy within sixty days after the conclusion of the audit.

B.  A pharmacy is allowed at least thirty days after receipt of the preliminary audit to provide documentation to address any discrepancy found in the audit.

C.  Each auditing entity shall establish and make available to network pharmacies a written appeals process that shall include a process to appeal, investigate and resolve disputes regarding final audit findings.  A pharmacy shall have at least thirty days from the delivery of the final audit findings to appeal an unfavorable audit finding to the auditing entity.  This written appeals process shall be included in all contracts between a pharmacy benefits manager and a network pharmacy or a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy's contracting representative.

D.  Each auditing entity shall provide a telephone number at which a network pharmacy may contact the pharmacy benefits manager and speak to someone who is responsible for processing appeals.

E.  The auditing entity must deliver a final audit report to the pharmacy within ninety days after receipt of the preliminary audit report or final appeal, whichever is later.

F.  Chargebacks, recoupment or other penalties may not be assessed until the appeals process has been exhausted and the final audit report has been issued.

G.  Unless otherwise required by state or federal law, audit information may not be shared with any entity other than the insurer on whose behalf the audit was conducted.  Auditors may have access only to previous audit reports on a particular pharmacy conducted by that same auditing entity. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE20-3324.  Applicability

A.  Notwithstanding any other law, this article applies only to audits conducted of pharmacies located in this state.

B.  This article does not apply to claims reviews that are initiated within three business days after transmission of a claim in which no chargeback or recoupment is demanded.

C.  This article does not apply to an audit conducted in which a suspicion of fraudulent activity or other intentional and wilful misrepresentation is evidenced by physical review, review of claims data, statements or other investigative methods.  The reason for an audit specified in this subsection shall be documented and available on request.END_STATUTE

Sec. 2.  Applicability

This act applies to contracts entered into, amended, extended or renewed and audits initiated from and after December 31, 2016.


 

 

 

APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 17, 2016.

 

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 17, 2016.

feedback