Bill Text: CA AB3145 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Family preservation services: standards.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-04-24 - From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. [AB3145 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB3145-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 16, 2024 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 3145
| Introduced by Assembly |
February 16, 2024 |
An act to amend Section 16500.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to child welfare.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 3145, as amended, Bryan.
Family preservation services: standards.
Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services (department) and county welfare departments to establish and support a public system of statewide child welfare services available in each county, as specified.
Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to encourage the continuity of the family unit by providing family preservation services, which may include counseling, mental health treatment, and transportation, among other things. Existing law requires an authorized participating county to provide specific programs of direct services based on individual family needs, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county to establish family preservation programs that serve one or more geographic areas of the county, subject to the approval of the department. Existing law requires that the services selected by a participating
county be reasonable and meritorious, as specified.
This bill, the Foster Care Justice through Meaningful Help for Parents Act, would also require that those services be evidence based, as defined, and culturally competent, as provided through qualified professionals. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. The bill would require the department, by January 1, 2026, to define, by regulation, the terms “culturally competent” and “qualified professional.” have a track record of helping families, have their outcomes tracked and reported, and be designed to eradicate the situation that necessitated intervention. The bill would require the service providers selected by a participating county to be reasonable, meritorious, cost effective, and to have a documented success at avoiding
out-of-home placement, or reducing the length of stay in out-of-home placement, or provide services with the same documented success, which is required to be reviewed at the time of the initial selection and no less than every 3 years thereafter. The bill would make related findings and declarations.
Under existing law, the program in each county is deemed successful if certain standards are met, including that at least 60% of the children receiving services remain at home one year, and 2 years, after services are terminated.
This bill would add as a standard that, during the first year after services are terminated, no more than 25% of children whose parents or guardian received services are children who meet any of specified circumstances, including removal from the physical custody of their parents or guardians. The bill would also add, among other standards, 2 years after termination of the
services, that no more than 10% of the children meet any of those circumstances.
Existing law requires the Office of Child Abuse Prevention within the department to require counties to submit annual reports on program services and children and families served.
This bill would require that the annual reports include certain information, including, among other things, a description of how a county’s contracts with providers ensure minimum qualifications. information to demonstrate whether the services meet the standards for being deemed successful. The bill would require the department to post the annual report to its internet website within 30 business days of receipt of an annual report from a county.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
(a) This act shall be known as the Foster Care Justice through Meaningful Help for Parents Act.(b) The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(1) Black children and Native American children alone among ethnic groups Children of color in California become foster children at rates that far exceed their proportion of the population. For example, in California, 21 percent of foster children are Black.
(2) Black children comprise about 5 percent of the state’s children. Native American children comprise less than 1 percent of all California children, but exceed 1 percent of children in foster care.
(3) As the Legislative Analyst’s Office has documented:
(A) “The proportions of Black and Native American youth in foster care are around four times larger than the proportions of Black and Native American youth in California overall.”
(B) “In addition, recent research on cumulative child welfare involvement of California’s 1999 birth cohort found nearly one in two Black and Native American children experienced some level of child welfare involvement by the time they turned 18 (compared to around 29 percent of Hispanic children, 22 percent of White children,
and 13 percent of Asian/Pacific Islander children).”
(C) “Racial disproportionalities and disparities . . . persist at all levels of the system.”
(c) (1) One way to promote racial justice in foster care is to ensure that parents involved in the foster care system are receiving reunification services that actually work to keep them and their children out of the foster care system and are culturally competent. As the Los Angeles Times found after a nearly year-long investigation: “The state does not ensure that parent education programs meet any sort of standards, allows parents facing abuse allegations to take classes that experts have deemed low quality, and cannot provide research evidence for half the programs listed in a state-funded database meant to act as a key tool for local officials to ensure child safety.”
(2) Taxpayers, too, deserve to know their tax dollars are being spent on services for families that actually help them.
SEC. 2.
Section 16500.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:16500.5.
(a) (1) The Legislature hereby declares its intent to encourage the continuity of the family unit by all of the following:(A) Consistently providing evidence-based, culturally competent family preservation services through qualified professionals. that have a track record of actually helping families.
(B) Ensuring that contracts for family preservation services establish minimum standards for being evidence based, for the quality of providers of those services, and for
tracking and reporting the outcomes of those services.
(C) Providing evidence-based, culturally competent supportive services, through qualified professionals, services that have their outcomes tracked and reported for those children within the meaning of Sections 360, 361, and 364 when they are returned to the family unit or when a minor will probably soon be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 301.
(D) Providing evidence-based, culturally
competent counseling and family support services, through qualified professionals, services designed to eradicate the situation that necessitated intervention. intervention and that have a track record of actually helping families.
(2) The Legislature finds that maintaining abused and neglected children in foster care grows increasingly costly each year, and that adequate funding for family services that might enable these children to remain in their homes is not as readily available as funding for foster care placement.
(3) The Legislature further finds that other state bodies have addressed this problem through various systems of flexible reimbursement in child welfare programs that provide for more intensive and appropriate services to prevent foster care placement or significantly reduce the length of stay in foster care.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that family preservation and support services in California conform to the federal definitions contained in Section 431 of the Social Security Act. The Legislature finds and declares that California’s existing family preservation programs meet the intent of the federal Promoting Safe and Stable Families program.
(c) (1) Services that may be provided under this program may include, but are not limited to, counseling, mental health treatment and substance
abuse treatment services, including treatment at a residential substance abuse treatment facility that accepts families, parenting, respite, day treatment, transportation, homemaking, and family support services. Each county that chooses to provide mental health treatment and substance abuse treatment shall identify and develop these services in consultation with county mental health treatment and substance abuse treatment agencies. Additional services may include those enumerated in Sections 16506 and 16507. The services to be provided pursuant to this section may be determined by each participating county. Each county may contract with individuals and organizations for services to be provided pursuant to this section. Each county shall utilize available private nonprofit resources in the county prior to developing new county-operated resources when these private nonprofit resources are of at least equal quality and costs as county-operated resources and shall utilize available county resources of at least
equal quality and cost prior to new private nonprofit resources.
(2) Participating counties authorized by this subdivision shall provide evidence-based, culturally competent specific programs of direct services, through qualified professionals,
services based on individual family needs as reflected in the service plans to families of the following:
(A) Children who are dependent children not taken from physical custody of their parents or guardians pursuant to Section 364.
(B) Children who are dependent children removed from the physical custody of their parents or guardian pursuant to Section 361.
(C) Children who it is determined will probably soon be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 301.
(D) Upon approval of the department, children who have been adjudged wards of the court pursuant to Sections 601 and 602.
(E) Upon approval of the department, families of
children subject to Sections 726 and 727.
(F) Upon approval of the department, children who are determined to require out-of-home placement.
(3) The services shall only be provided to families whose children will be placed in out-of-home care without the provision of services or to children who can be returned to their families with the provision of services.
(4) The services service providers selected by a participating county shall be evidence based, culturally competent, provided through qualified professionals, reasonable, and meritorious and shall demonstrate cost-effectiveness and
reasonable, meritorious, shall demonstrate cost-effectiveness, and shall have a documented success at avoiding out-of-home placement, or reducing the length of stay in out-of-home placement. placement, or provide services with the same documented success, which documentation shall be reviewed for each provider at the time of the initial selection and no less than every three years thereafter. A county shall not expend more funds for services under this subdivision than that amount which would be expended for placement in out-of-home care.
(5) The services provided pursuant to this section in each county shall be deemed successful if they meet the following standards:
(A) The services enable families to resolve their own problems, effectively utilize service systems, and advocate for their children in educational and social agencies.
(B) The services enhance family functioning by building on family strengths.
(C) At least 75 percent of the children receiving services remain in their own home for six months after termination of services.
(D) During the first year after services are terminated, the following criteria are met:
(i) At least 60 percent of the children receiving services remain at home one year after services are terminated.
(ii) The average length of stay in out-of-home care of children selected to receive services who have
already been removed from their home and placed in out-of-home care is 50 percent less than the average length of stay in out-of-home care of children who do not receive program services.
(iii) No more than 25 percent of children whose parents or guardian received services are children who meet any of the following circumstances, with that percentage limit separately applicable to each circumstance:
(I) Are taken removed from the physical custody of their parents or guardian pursuant to Section 300 or subdivision (e) of Section 364.
(II) Are removed from the physical custody of their parents or guardian pursuant to subdivisions (b) to (d), inclusive, of Section 361.
(III) Are determined to probably soon be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 301.
(IV) Have been adjudged wards of the court pursuant to Section 601 or 602.
(V) Are families of children subject to Sections 726 and 727.
(VI) Are children who are determined to require out-of-home placement.
(E) Two years after the termination of family preservation services, the following criteria are met:
(i) The average length of out-of-home stay of children selected to receive services under this section who, at the time of selection, are in out-of-home care, is 50 percent less than the average length of stay in out-of-home care for children in out-of-home care who do not receive services pursuant to this section.
(ii) At least 60 percent of the children who were returned home pursuant to this section remain at home.
(iii) No more than 10 percent of children whose parents or guardian received services are children who meet any of the circumstances listed in clause (iii) of subparagraph (D), with that percentage limit separately applicable to each circumstance.
(iv) No children who were returned home died or nearly died due to abuse or neglect.
(6) Funds used for services provided under this section shall supplement, not supplant, child welfare services funds available for services pursuant to Sections 16506 and 16507.
(7) Programs authorized after the original pilot projects shall submit data to the department upon the department’s request.
(d) (1) A county welfare department social worker or probation officer may, pursuant to an appropriate court order, return a dependent minor or ward of the court removed from the home pursuant to Section 361 to the dependent minor’s or ward’s home, with appropriate interagency family preservation program services.
(2) The county probation department may, with the approval of the State Department of Social Services, through an interagency
agreement with the county welfare department, refer cases to the county welfare department for the direct provision of services under this subdivision.
(e) Foster care funds shall remain within the administrative authority of the county welfare department and shall be used only for placement services or placement prevention services or county welfare department administrative cost related to the interagency family preservation program.
(f) To the extent permitted by federal law, any federal funds provided for services to families and children may be utilized for the purposes of this section.
(g) A county may establish family preservation programs that serve one or more geographic areas of the county, subject to the approval of the State Department of Social Services.
(1) All funds expended by a county for activities under this section shall be expended by the county in a manner that will maximize eligibility for federal financial participation.
(2) A county, subject to the approval of the State Department of Social Services, may claim federal financial participation, if allowable and available, as provided by the State Department of Social Services in the federal Promoting Safe and Stable Families program in accordance with the federal guidelines and regulations for that county’s AFDC–FC AFDCFC expenditures pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 11450, for children subject to Sections 300, 301, 360, and 364, in advance, provided that the county conducts a
program of family reunification and family maintenance services for families receiving these services pursuant to Sections 300, 301, 360, and 364, and as permitted by the department, children subject to Sections 601, 602, 726, and 727 of this code and Section 7572.5 of the Government Code.
(h) In order to maintain federal funding and meet federal requirements, the State Department of Social Services and the Office of Child Abuse Prevention shall provide administrative oversight, monitoring, and consultation to ensure both of the following:
(1) (A) Each county includes in its county plan information that details what services are to be funded under this section and who will be served, and how the services are coordinated with the array of services available in the county. In order to maintain federal funding to meet federal requirements, the State Department
of Social Services shall review these plans and provide technical assistance as needed, as provided in Section 10601.2. In order to meet federal requirements, the Office of Child Abuse Prevention shall require counties to submit annual reports, as part of the current reporting process, on program services and children and families served. The annual reporting process shall be developed jointly by the department and county agencies for the purpose of meeting federal reporting requirements.
(B) The annual reports described in subparagraph (A) shall include the information and data described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (c), demonstrating whether the services meet the standards for being deemed successful, whether the county’s services are evidence based, whether its services are culturally competent, a description of how its contracts with providers ensure that competence, whether its services are provided by qualified professionals, a description of how its contracts with providers ensure those minimum qualifications, and
the name of each provider of services described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) (c), and whether the provider’s services were deemed successful pursuant to that paragraph. Within 30 business days of receipt of an annual report from a county, the department shall post the annual report to its internet website.
(2) In order to maximize federal financial participation for the federal Promoting Safe and Stable Families grant, funds expended from this program are in compliance with data-reporting data reporting requirements in order to meet federal
nonsupplantation requirements in accordance with Section 1357.32(f) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the 25 percent state match requirement in accordance with Section 1357.32(d) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(i) Beginning in the 2011–12 fiscal year, and for each fiscal year thereafter, funding and expenditures for programs and activities under this section shall be made with moneys allocated pursuant to Section 30025 of the Government Code.
(j)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)“Evidence based” means services based on the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, culture, and preferences and includes the definition used by the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare.
(2)“Family
(j) For purposes of this section, “family preservation services” means intensive services for families whose children, without these services, would be subject to any of the following:
(A)
(1) Be at imminent risk of out-of-home placement.
(B)
(2) Remain in existing out-of-home placement for longer periods of time.
(C)
(3) Be placed in a more restrictive out-of-home placement.
(k)By January 1, 2026, the State Department of Social Services shall, by regulation, define both of the following terms:
(1)Culturally competent.
(2)Qualified professional. For purposes of this term, the professional shall meet minimum or higher qualifications, with the department establishing the minimum qualifications.
