Bill Text: CT HJ00043 | 2016 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of The Claims Of The Estate Of Kevin Cales, Jose Colon, Frank And Melinda Dumond And Ken Krayeske.

Spectrum: Committee Bill

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2016-05-03 - On Consent Calendar / In Concurrence [HJ00043 Detail]

Download: Connecticut-2016-HJ00043-Introduced.html

General Assembly

 

Substitute House Joint Resolution No. 43

    February Session, 2016

 

*_____HJ00043JUD___033016____*

RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF THE CLAIMS OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN CALES, JOSE COLON, FRANK AND MELINDA DUMOND AND KEN KRAYESKE.

Resolved by this Assembly:

Section 1. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 21824 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of the estate of Kevin Cales, is vacated and the claim is remanded to the Claims Commissioner for a hearing on the merits.

Sec. 2. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24198 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Jose Colon, is vacated and the claim is remanded to the Claims Commissioner for a hearing on the merits.

Sec. 3. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23894 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Frank and Melinda Dumond, is vacated and the claim is remanded to the Claims Commissioner for a hearing on the merits.

Sec. 4. (a) That, notwithstanding the failure to file a claim against the state within the time limitations specified by subsection (a) of section 4-148 of the general statutes, Kenneth J. Krayeske is authorized pursuant to the provisions of subsection (b) of section 4-148 of the general statutes to present his claim, file number 22750, against the state to the Claims Commissioner. The General Assembly deems such authorization to be just and equitable and finds that such authorization is supported by compelling equitable circumstances and would serve a public purpose and accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (4) of subsection (b) of section 4-159 of the general statutes, remands the claim to the Claims Commissioner for a hearing on the merits of such claim.

(b) That the state shall be barred from setting up the failure to comply with the provisions of section 4-148 of the general statutes, from denying that notice of the claim was properly and timely given pursuant to section 4-148 of the general statutes and from setting up the fact that the claim had once been considered by the Claims Commissioner, by the General Assembly or in a judicial proceeding as defenses to such claim.

JUD

Joint Favorable Subst.

 
feedback