Bill Text: HI SB189 | 2021 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Relating To Dog Bites.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Passed) 2021-06-10 - Act 030, 06/07/2021 (Gov. Msg. No. 1130). [SB189 Detail]
Download: Hawaii-2021-SB189-Amended.html
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
189 |
|
THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
|
C.D. 1 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO DOG BITES.
BE IT
ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that dog bites are among the top reasons for emergency room visits, ranking higher than injuries occurring on motorcycles, to pedestrians, and from gunshots. According to a 2018 study, an average of over 4.6 million people in the United States each year are admitted into the emergency department as a result of a dog bite. Many dog bite victims are children.
The legislature further finds that the current state law only allows a dog bite victim standing in district court if it can be proven to the court that the dog has bitten and injured a person on at least two separate occasions. However, the legislature notes there is no systematic tracking system for dog bites in the State and many dog bite incidents go unreported.
Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to allow a person who has been bitten by a dog to bring legal action against the dog's owner without having to prove that the dog has bitten a person on two separate occasions.
SECTION 2. Section 142-75, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) Whenever a dog has bitten a human being [on
at least two separate occasions] under circumstances for which none
of the exceptions specified in section 663-9.1 apply, any person may bring an
action against the owner of the dog in the district court of the judicial circuit
in which the owner resides, to determine whether conditions of the treatment or
confinement of the dog or other circumstances existing at the time of the bite
or bites have been changed so as to remove the danger to other persons
presented by [such] the animal.
The court, after hearing, may make any order it deems appropriate to
prevent the recurrence of such an incident, including but not limited to the
removal of the animal from the area or its destruction by its owner. In making its decision, the court may
consider:
(1) The vicious or dangerous propensities of the animal;
(2) The ability of the owner to adequately confine or remove the animal; and
(3) The necessity of any destruction of an animal in light of the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
This section shall not preclude any existing common law remedies."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Report Title:
Dog Bites; Action Against Owner; Conditions; Danger
Description:
Removes the requirement to prove that a dog has bitten a person on at least two separate occasions prior to bringing legal action against a dog's owner to determine whether conditions of treatment or confinement have changed so as to remove the danger the dog poses to other persons. (CD1)
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
