Bill Text: IL HR0234 | 2011-2012 | 97th General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Urges the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to consider whether a surety program should be administered to provide a financial guarantee to bonding companies for projects conducted by minority-owned and women-owned small businesses. Urges the Department of Insurance to find ways to help identify and encourage bond companies to participate in a program for minority-owned and women-owned small business construction firms. Urges the Department of Transportation and the Capital Development Board to review their bonding requirements for minority-owned and women-owned small business participants in light of the number of defaults by those companies over the last 5 years to determine whether their requirements are more stringent than necessary. Urges the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, the Department of Insurance, the Department of Transportation, and the Capital Development Board to report to the General Assembly with recommendations to reform bonding requirements for minority-owned and women-owned small business firms in public construction projects.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 7-0)
Status: (Failed) 2013-01-08 - Session Sine Die [HR0234 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2011-HR0234-Introduced.html
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Small business growth is at the heart of any | ||||||
3 | economic recovery as most new jobs are created by small | ||||||
4 | businesses; and
| ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, Minority-owned and women-owned small businesses | ||||||
6 | (M/WBEs) are particularly important drivers of job growth for | ||||||
7 | African-Americans and Latinos who experience | ||||||
8 | disproportionately high unemployment rates; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, It has long been a strategic objective of the | ||||||
10 | State of Illinois to support the development of minority-owned | ||||||
11 | and women-owned businesses through the M/WBE programs for State | ||||||
12 | procurement, particularly in construction; and
| ||||||
13 | WHEREAS, During the recent credit crunch, one of the single | ||||||
14 | largest barriers to growth for women-owned and minority-owned | ||||||
15 | construction businesses has been bonding requirements and the | ||||||
16 | very stringent financial terms imposed upon M/WBE businesses by | ||||||
17 | the bonding companies; and
| ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, It is not uncommon for a bonding company to | ||||||
19 | require a construction company to deposit half the amount of | ||||||
20 | the total value of a construction contract in an escrow account | ||||||
21 | in order for the bonding company to sell to the construction |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | company a performance bond for the project; and
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, As M/WBE construction firms tend not to be heavily | ||||||
3 | capitalized, the rates charged to the M/WBE firms by the | ||||||
4 | bonding companies tend to be far higher than the rates charged | ||||||
5 | to large legacy firms; and
| ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, The purpose of a bond requirement is to | ||||||
7 | financially reimburse the State in the event of default by the | ||||||
8 | construction company, not to suppress competition or enrich | ||||||
9 | bond companies; and
| ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, There may be more efficient alternative methods to | ||||||
11 | protect the State from any financial loss in the event of lack | ||||||
12 | of performance by M/WBE firms on a construction project; and
| ||||||
13 | WHEREAS, The members of the Federation of Women Contractors | ||||||
14 | believe that the current state of the bond market and the bond | ||||||
15 | requirements are among very significant impediments to growth; | ||||||
16 | therefore, be it
| ||||||
17 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | ||||||
18 | NINETY-SEVENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that | ||||||
19 | the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity consider | ||||||
20 | whether a surety program successfully administered years ago be | ||||||
21 | resurrected in order to provide a financial guarantee to |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | bonding companies for projects conducted by M/WBE firms in | ||||||
2 | order to lower the costs to M/WBE firms and increase their | ||||||
3 | access to capital; and be it further
| ||||||
4 | RESOLVED, That the Department of Insurance, which | ||||||
5 | regulates bond issuing companies, consider how it can help | ||||||
6 | identify and encourage bond companies to participate in a | ||||||
7 | program for M/WBE construction firms; and be it further
| ||||||
8 | RESOLVED, That the Department of Transportation and the | ||||||
9 | Capital Development Board review their bonding requirements | ||||||
10 | for M/WBE participants in light of the actual number of | ||||||
11 | defaults by M/WBE companies over the last 5 years to determine | ||||||
12 | whether the bonding requirements are more stringent than | ||||||
13 | necessary to protect against risk; and be it further
| ||||||
14 | RESOLVED, That the Department of Commerce and Economic | ||||||
15 | Opportunity, the Department of Insurance, the Department of | ||||||
16 | Transportation, and the Capital Development Board report to the | ||||||
17 | General Assembly with recommendations to reform bonding | ||||||
18 | requirements for M/WBE firms in public construction projects by | ||||||
19 | January 15, 2012.
|