Bill Text: IN HB1360 | 2013 | Regular Session | Introduced


Bill Title: Education and workforce roundtable.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2013-01-22 - First reading: referred to Committee on Education [HB1360 Detail]

Download: Indiana-2013-HB1360-Introduced.html


Introduced Version






HOUSE BILL No. 1360

_____


DIGEST OF INTRODUCED BILL



Citations Affected: IC 4-3-23; IC 20-19-4; IC 20-20; IC 20-31; IC 20-34-6-1; IC 21-43.

Synopsis: Education and workforce roundtable. Establishes the governor's education and workforce roundtable, staffed by the commission for higher education, to provide recommendations concerning a comprehensive system of prekindergarten through postsecondary education. Repeals the law concerning the existing education roundtable. Changes references from the "education roundtable" to the "governor's education and workforce roundtable".

Effective: July 1, 2013.





Huston




    January 22, 2013, read first time and referred to Committee on Education.







Introduced

First Regular Session 118th General Assembly (2013)


PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type, additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in this style type.
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or this style type reconciles conflicts between statutes enacted by the 2012 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

HOUSE BILL No. 1360



    A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning state and local administration.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:

SOURCE: IC 4-3-23; (13)IN1360.1.1. -->     SECTION 1. IC 4-3-23 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW CHAPTER TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]:
     Chapter 23. Governor's Education and Workforce Roundtable
    Sec. 1.
     As used in this chapter, "roundtable" refers to the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by section 2 of this chapter.
    Sec. 2. The governor's education and workforce roundtable is established.
    Sec. 3. (a) The roundtable consists of the following members:
        (1) Fifteen (15) members appointed by the governor. These members must be representatives of:
            (A) business and community leaders;
            (B) elementary and secondary education, including programs for exceptional learners (as defined in IC 20-31-2-6); and
            (C) higher education.
        Eight (8) members must be appointed under clause (A).
        (2) Two (2) members appointed by the president pro tempore of the senate, each of whom must be from a different political party, who shall serve as nonvoting members.
        (3) Two (2) members appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, each of whom must be from a different political party, who shall serve as nonvoting members.
    (b) The roundtable shall create an advisory committee on early childhood education. The members of the advisory committee must be early childhood education leaders from around Indiana. The advisory committee shall provide to the roundtable professional and technical assistance concerning topics related to early childhood education.
    Sec. 4. (a) A member of the roundtable or the advisory committee on early childhood education is not entitled to a salary per diem.
    (b) A member of the roundtable or the advisory committee on early childhood education is entitled to reimbursement for traveling expenses and other expenses actually incurred in connection with the member's duties, as provided in the state travel policies and procedures established by the Indiana department of administration and approved by the budget agency.
    Sec. 5. (a) The governor, the state superintendent of public instruction, the commissioner for higher education, and the commissioner of the department of workforce development shall jointly serve as cochairpersons of the roundtable. The roundtable shall meet:
        (1) upon the call of the cochairpersons; and
        (2) at least quarterly.
    (b) A quorum of the roundtable must be present to conduct business. A quorum consists of a majority of the voting members appointed to the roundtable. The roundtable may not take an official action unless the official action has been approved by at least a majority of the members appointed to serve on the roundtable.
    Sec. 6. (a) The governor shall appoint an executive director for the roundtable.
    (b) The commission for higher education shall provide staff for the roundtable.
    Sec. 7. The roundtable is a permanent body and working group.
    Sec. 8. (a) The roundtable shall provide recommendations on subjects related to a comprehensive system of prekindergarten

through postsecondary education to the following:
        (1) The governor.
        (2) The state superintendent of public instruction.
        (3) The general assembly.
        (4) The state board of education.
        (5) The commission for higher education.
        (6) The department of workforce development.
    (b) The recommendations to the general assembly must be in an electronic format under IC 5-14-6.
    Sec. 9. (a) As used in this section, "total estimated fiscal impact" means the annual fiscal impact of a recommendation on all affected entities after the recommendation is fully implemented under subsection (f).
    (b) Subject to subsection (e), before providing a recommendation under section 8 of this chapter, the roundtable shall prepare an analysis of the total estimated fiscal impact that the recommendation will have on the state, political subdivisions, and all nonpublic schools affected by the recommendation. In preparing an analysis under this subsection, the roundtable shall consider any applicable information submitted by entities affected by the recommendation. The analysis prepared under this subsection must be submitted with the recommendation under section 8 of this chapter.
    (c) If the roundtable provides a recommendation under section 8 of this chapter and the total estimated fiscal impact analysis prepared under subsection (b) indicates that the impact of the recommendation will be at least five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), the roundtable shall submit a copy of the recommendation and the fiscal analysis prepared under subsection (b) to the legislative services agency for review. This recommendation must be in an electronic format under IC 5-14-6. Not more than forty-five (45) days after receiving a copy of the recommendation and fiscal impact analysis, the legislative services agency shall prepare a fiscal impact statement concerning the effect that compliance with the recommendation will have on:
        (1) the state; and
        (2) all:
            (A) political subdivisions; and
            (B) nonpublic schools;
        affected by the proposed recommendation.
The fiscal impact statement must contain the direct total estimated fiscal impact of the recommendation and a determination

concerning the extent to which the recommendation creates an unfunded mandate on the state, a political subdivision, or a nonpublic school affected by the proposed recommendation.
    (d) A fiscal impact statement prepared under subsection (c) is a public document. The legislative services agency shall make the fiscal impact statement available to interested parties upon request. The roundtable shall provide the legislative services agency with the information necessary to prepare the fiscal impact statement. In preparing the fiscal impact statement, the legislative services agency may also receive and consider applicable information from the entities affected by the recommendation. The legislative services agency shall provide copies of the fiscal impact statement to each of the persons described in section 8 of this chapter.
    (e) In determining whether a recommendation under this section has a total estimated fiscal impact of at least five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) on the affected entities, the roundtable shall consider the impact of the recommendation on any entity that already complies with the standards imposed by the recommendation on a voluntary basis, if applicable.
    (f) For purposes of this section, a recommendation is fully implemented after:
        (1) the conclusion of any phase-in period during which:
            (A) the recommendation is gradually made to apply to certain affected entities; or
            (B) the costs of the recommendation are gradually implemented; and
        (2) the recommendation applies to all affected entities that will be affected by the recommendation.
In determining the total estimated fiscal impact of a recommendation under this section, the roundtable shall consider the annual fiscal impact on all affected entities beginning with the first twelve (12) month period or first school year after the recommendation is fully implemented, whichever applies. The roundtable may use actual or forecasted data and may consider the actual and anticipated effects of inflation and deflation. The roundtable shall describe any assumptions made and any data used in determining the total estimated fiscal impact of a recommendation under this section.
    Sec. 10. The roundtable shall review and make recommendations to the state board of education for the state board of education's approval concerning the following:


        (1) The academic standards under IC 20-31-3, IC 20-32-4, IC 20-32-5, and IC 20-32-6 for all grade levels from kindergarten through grade 12.
        (2) The content and format of the ISTEP program, including the following:
            (A) The graduation examination.
            (B) The passing scores required at the various grade levels tested under the ISTEP program.
    Sec. 11. (a) In making recommendations under section 10 of this chapter, the roundtable shall consider:
        (1) a variety of available national and international assessments and tests;
        (2) the development of an assessment or test unique to Indiana; and
        (3) any combination of assessments or tests described in subdivisions (1) and (2).
    (b) In making recommendations under section 10 of this chapter, the roundtable shall recommend to the state board of education only state tests that, when appropriate:
        (1) present the content of each test in an interdisciplinary manner; and
        (2) provide each student with the opportunity to meet the academic standards in an applied manner.
    Sec. 12. The commission for higher education, in consultation with the state board of education and the department of workforce development, may adopt rules under IC 4-22-2 to implement this chapter
.
SOURCE: IC 20-19-4; (13)IN1360.1.2. -->     SECTION 2. IC 20-19-4 IS REPEALED [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]. (Education Roundtable).
SOURCE: IC 20-20-8-8; (13)IN1360.1.3. -->     SECTION 3. IC 20-20-8-8, AS AMENDED BY P.L.3-2008, SECTION 115, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 8. The report must include the following information:
        (1) Student enrollment.
        (2) Graduation rate (as defined in IC 20-26-13-6).
        (3) Attendance rate.
        (4) The following test scores, including the number and percentage of students meeting academic standards:
            (A) ISTEP program test scores.
            (B) Scores for assessments under IC 20-32-5-21, if appropriate.
            (C) For a freeway school, scores on a locally adopted

assessment program, if appropriate.
        (5) Average class size.
        (6) The number and percentage of students in the following groups or programs:
            (A) Alternative education, if offered.
            (B) Career and technical education.
            (C) Special education.
            (D) High ability.
            (E) Remediation.
            (F) Limited English language proficiency.
            (G) Students receiving free or reduced price lunch under the national school lunch program.
            (H) School flex program, if offered.
        (7) Advanced placement, including the following:
            (A) For advanced placement tests, the percentage of students:
                (i) scoring three (3), four (4), and five (5); and
                (ii) taking the test.
            (B) For the Scholastic Aptitude Test:
                (i) test scores for all students taking the test;
                (ii) test scores for students completing the academic honors diploma program; and
                (iii) the percentage of students taking the test.
        (8) Course completion, including the number and percentage of students completing the following programs:
            (A) Academic honors diploma.
            (B) Core 40 curriculum.
            (C) Career and technical programs.
        (9) The percentage of grade 8 students enrolled in algebra I.
        (10) The percentage of graduates who pursue higher education.
        (11) School safety, including:
            (A) the number of students receiving suspension or expulsion for the possession of alcohol, drugs, or weapons; and
            (B) the number of incidents reported under IC 20-33-9.
        (12) Financial information and various school cost factors, including the following:
            (A) Expenditures per pupil.
            (B) Average teacher salary.
            (C) Remediation funding.
        (13) Technology accessibility and use of technology in instruction.
        (14) Interdistrict and intradistrict student mobility rates, if that information is available.


        (15) The number and percentage of each of the following within the school corporation:
            (A) Teachers who are certificated employees (as defined in IC 20-29-2-4).
            (B) Teachers who teach the subject area for which the teacher is certified and holds a license.
            (C) Teachers with national board certification.
        (16) The percentage of grade 3 students reading at grade 3 level.
        (17) The number of students expelled, including the number participating in other recognized education programs during their expulsion.
        (18) Chronic absenteeism, which includes the number of students who have been absent more than ten (10) days from school within a school year without being excused.
        (19) The number of students who have dropped out of school, including the reasons for dropping out.
        (20) The number of student work permits revoked.
        (21) The number of student driver's licenses revoked.
        (22) The number of students who have not advanced to grade 10 due to a lack of completed credits.
        (23) The number of students suspended for any reason.
        (24) The number of students receiving an international baccalaureate diploma.
        (25) Other indicators of performance as recommended by the governor's education and workforce roundtable under IC 20-19-4. IC 4-3-23.
SOURCE: IC 20-20-35-4; (13)IN1360.1.4. -->     SECTION 4. IC 20-20-35-4, AS ADDED BY P.L.234-2007, SECTION 62, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 4. (a) To be eligible for selection as a pilot program grant recipient, an eligible provider must do the following:
        (1) Apply to the department for a grant, on forms provided by the department, and include a detailed description of the eligible provider's proposed prekindergarten program. The description must include at least the following information:
            (A) An estimate of the number of students likely to participate.
            (B) A description of the prekindergarten curriculum that will be instituted by the eligible provider. The prekindergarten curriculum must be consistent with the Foundations to the Indiana Academic Standards for Young Children (or successor standards adopted by the department of education).
            (C) A description of how the curriculum of the proposed prekindergarten program aligns with existing programs and

standards for students in kindergarten through grade 3.
            (D) An estimate of the cost of implementing the prekindergarten program.
        (2) Demonstrate a commitment by teachers, parents, and school administrators toward carrying out the proposed prekindergarten program.
        (3) Comply with any other requirements set forth by the department.
    (b) Subject to section 6 of this chapter, after review of the applications submitted under this section, the department shall do the following:
        (1) Select the eligible providers that will participate in the pilot program.
        (2) Provide grants to the eligible providers selected to participate in the pilot program.
    (c) The governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2 shall provide recommendations to the department concerning the criteria to be used by the department in selecting the eligible providers that will participate in the pilot program.
    (d) The criteria to be used by the department in selecting the eligible providers that will participate in the pilot program must do the following:
        (1) Include at least an evaluation of the following:
            (A) The information submitted by the eligible provider under subsection (a).
            (B) The coordination of the proposed prekindergarten program with local health services and social services.
        (2) Take into consideration the requirements of section 6 of this chapter.

SOURCE: IC 20-31-3-5; (13)IN1360.1.5. -->     SECTION 5. IC 20-31-3-5, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 5. An academic standards committee shall submit recommendations on academic standards for a subject area to the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 20-19-4-2 IC 4-3-23-2 for review by the educational governor's education and workforce roundtable.
SOURCE: IC 20-31-4-2; (13)IN1360.1.6. -->     SECTION 6. IC 20-31-4-2, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 2. (a) A school in Indiana may be accredited:
        (1) under the performance based accreditation system established by this chapter; or
        (2) by implementing a quality focused approach to school improvement such as the criteria for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award for Education or for a national or regional accreditation agency that is recommended by the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2 and approved by the state board.
    (b) The state board shall establish the following:
        (1) A performance based accreditation system for accrediting schools in Indiana under this chapter.
        (2) A procedure for determining whether a school is making progress toward meeting the criteria for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award for Education or a national or regional accreditation agency.
    (c) The department shall establish a schedule for accrediting schools under this chapter.
SOURCE: IC 20-31-7-6; (13)IN1360.1.7. -->     SECTION 7. IC 20-31-7-6, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 6. The governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2 shall recommend to the state board a system for awarding and distributing grants under this chapter. A system recommended under this section must be based on graduated levels of improvement based on ISTEP program standards and other assessments recommended and approved by the governor's education and workforce roundtable.
SOURCE: IC 20-31-7-7; (13)IN1360.1.8. -->     SECTION 8. IC 20-31-7-7, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 7. (a) The governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2 shall study the use of individual student assessment data:
        (1) to implement this chapter;
        (2) to analyze student performance over time on various assessments; and
        (3) for other purposes developed by the roundtable.
    (b) Any recommendation of the governor's education and workforce roundtable concerning the use of individual student assessment data must be tested in a pilot project before the recommendation may be implemented on a statewide basis.
SOURCE: IC 20-31-8-1; (13)IN1360.1.9. -->     SECTION 9. IC 20-31-8-1, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 1. (a) The performance of a school's students on the ISTEP program test and other assessments recommended by the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2, and

approved by the state board, are the primary and majority means of assessing a school's improvement.
    (b) The governor's education and workforce roundtable shall examine and make recommendations to the state board concerning:
        (1) performance indicators to be used as a secondary means of determining school progress;
        (2) expected progress levels, continuous improvement measures, distributional performance levels, and absolute performance levels for schools; and
        (3) an orderly transition from the performance based accreditation system to the assessment system set forth in this article.
    (c) The governor's education and workforce roundtable shall consider methods of measuring improvement and progress used in other states in developing recommendations under this section.

SOURCE: IC 20-31-8-2; (13)IN1360.1.10. -->     SECTION 10. IC 20-31-8-2, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 2. (a) In addition to scores on the ISTEP program test and other assessments, the department shall use the performance indicators developed under section 1 of this chapter and the benchmarks and indicators of performance in each school corporation's annual performance report as a secondary means of assessing the improvement of each school and school corporation.
    (b) The department shall assess improvement in the following manner:
        (1) Compare each school and each school corporation with its own prior performance and not to the performance of other schools or school corporations.
        (2) Compare the results in the annual report under IC 20-20-8 with the benchmarks and indicators of performance established in the plan for the same school.
        (3) Compare the results for a school by comparing each student's results for each grade with the student's prior year results, with an adjustment for student mobility rate. The governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2 shall make recommendations concerning the incorporation of a statistical adjustment for student mobility rates into the results.
        (4) Compare the results for a school with the state average and the ninety-fifth percentile level for all assessments and performance indicators.
SOURCE: IC 20-31-8-3; (13)IN1360.1.11. -->     SECTION 11. IC 20-31-8-3, AS ADDED BY P.L.1-2005, SECTION 15, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 3. The state board shall establish a number of

categories or designations of school improvement based on the improvement that a school makes in performance of the measures determined by the board with the advice of the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 4-3-23-2. The categories or designations must reflect various levels of improvement.

SOURCE: IC 20-34-6-1; (13)IN1360.1.12. -->     SECTION 12. IC 20-34-6-1, AS ADDED BY P.L.74-2010, SECTION 3, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 1. (a) By July 1 of each year, each school corporation shall submit a report to the department detailing the following information for the current school year for each school in the school corporation and for the entire school corporation:
        (1) The number of arrests of students on school corporation property, including arrests made by law enforcement officers, security guards, school safety specialists, and other school corporation employees, and any citizen arrests.
        (2) The offenses for which students were arrested on school corporation property.
        (3) The number of contacts with law enforcement personnel from a school corporation employee that have resulted in arrests of students not on school corporation property.
        (4) Statistics concerning the age, race, and gender of students arrested on school corporation property and categorizing the statistics by offenses.
        (5) Whether the school corporation has established and employs a school corporation police department under IC 20-26-16, and if so, report:
            (A) the number of officers in the school corporation police department; and
            (B) the training the officers must complete.
        (6) If the school corporation employs private security guards to enforce rules or laws on school property, a detailed explanation of the use of private security guards by the school corporation.
        (7) If the school corporation has an agreement with a local law enforcement agency regarding procedures to arrest students on school property, a detailed explanation of the use of the local law enforcement agency by the school corporation.
    (b) By August 1 of each year, the department shall submit a report to:
        (1) the legislative council;
        (2) the governor's education and workforce roundtable established by IC 20-19-4-2; IC 4-3-23-2;
        (3) the board for the coordination of programs serving vulnerable

individuals established by IC 4-23-30.2-8; and
        (4) the criminal justice institute;
providing a summary of the reports submitted to the department under subsection (a). The report to the legislative council must be in an electronic format under IC 5-14-6.
    (c) By August 1 of each year, the department must post the reports described in subsections (a) and (b) on the department's Internet web site.

SOURCE: IC 21-43-6-6; (13)IN1360.1.13. -->     SECTION 13. IC 21-43-6-6, AS ADDED BY P.L.2-2007, SECTION 284, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 6. If Ivy Tech Community College establishes a program, Ivy Tech Community College shall report annually to the governor's education and workforce roundtable established under IC 20-19-4 by IC 4-3-23-2 the number of program participants and diplomas granted while earning credits for a certificate program or an associate's degree.
SOURCE: IC 21-43-7-6; (13)IN1360.1.14. -->     SECTION 14. IC 21-43-7-6, AS ADDED BY P.L.2-2007, SECTION 284, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 6. If Vincennes University establishes a program, Vincennes University shall report annually to the governor's education and workforce roundtable established under IC 20-19-4 by IC 4-3-23-2 the number of program participants and diplomas granted.
SOURCE: IC 21-43-8-6; (13)IN1360.1.15. -->     SECTION 15. IC 21-43-8-6, AS ADDED BY P.L.2-2007, SECTION 284, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]: Sec. 6. A state educational institution that establishes a program under this section shall report annually to the governor's education and workforce roundtable established under IC 20-19-4 by IC 4-3-23-2 the number of program participants and diplomas granted.

feedback