Bill Text: MI HB5801 | 2009-2010 | 95th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Legislature; committees; certain reports regarding section 29 of article IX of the state constitution; require the house and senate fiscal agencies to issue. Amends 1986 PA 268 (MCL 4.1101 - 4.1901) by adding sec. 502.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 4-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-11-10 - Referred To Second Reading [HB5801 Detail]
Download: Michigan-2009-HB5801-Introduced.html
HOUSE BILL No. 5801
February 9, 2010, Introduced by Reps. Mayes, McDowell, Kennedy and Barnett and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
A bill to amend 1986 PA 268, entitled
"Legislative council act,"
(MCL 4.1101 to 4.1901) by adding section 502.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 502. (1) Not later than December 31 of 2010 and every
year thereafter, the house and senate fiscal agencies shall issue a
report to the legislature, the governor, and the Michigan court of
appeals regarding the state's compliance with its funding
obligations to local units of government under section 29 of
article IX of the state constitution of 1963. The report shall
contain all of the following:
(a) The state-financed proportion of the necessary cost of
each activity or service required of local units of government by
existing law.
(b) The nature and scope of each state requirement that
requires a disbursement under section 29 of article IX of the state
constitution of 1963.
(c) The nature and scope of each action imposing a potential
cost on a local unit of government that is not a state requirement
and does not require a disbursement under section 29 of article IX
of the state constitution of 1963.
(d) The identity or type of local unit of government at which
each state requirement or required existing activity or service is
directed.
(e) Whether an identifiable local direct cost is necessitated
by each identified state requirement or required existing activity
or service.
(f) The amount of state financial participation needed to meet
each identifiable local direct cost.
(g) The state agency charged with supervising each identified
state requirement or required existing activity or service.
(h) A brief description of the purpose and origin of each
state requirement or required existing activity or service.
(i) A recommendation as to whether any state requirement or
activity or service required of local units of government by
existing law should be eliminated, redesigned to reduce the cost of
compliance, or fully or proportionately funded by the state,
depending on the date the requirement was first imposed.
(j) A recommendation as to whether required standards of
performance for optional activities and services provided by local
units of government or requirements not otherwise subject to
section 29 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 should
be reduced, reformed, eliminated, or fully funded by the state. The
recommendation shall consider whether requirements continue to be
necessary in light of the public interest and the financial
condition of the affected local units of government and whether the
state should modify the requirements to reduce the cost or increase
the efficiency with which the activities and services can be
provided.
(2) If the court of appeals rules that the state has failed to
fully fund the cost of complying with state requirements or the
state-financed proportion of the necessary cost of an existing
activity or service required of local units of government, the
house and senate fiscal agencies shall provide recommendations to
the legislature on how to address those decisions.