Bill Text: AZ SB1658 | 2024 | Fifty-sixth Legislature 2nd Regular | Introduced
Bill Title: Employment; law enforcement; attorney general
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-02-06 - Senate read second time [SB1658 Detail]
Download: Arizona-2024-SB1658-Introduced.html
|
REFERENCE TITLE: employment; law enforcement; attorney general |
|
State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session 2024
|
|
SB 1658 |
|
|
|
Introduced by Senator Gowan
|
An Act
amending section 38-532, Arizona Revised Statutes; amending title 38, chapter 3, article 9, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 38-535; relating to disclosure of information by public employees.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 38-532, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
38-532. Prohibited personnel practice; violation; reinstatement; exceptions; civil penalty
A. It is a prohibited personnel practice for an employee who has control over personnel actions to take reprisal against an employee for a disclosure of information of a matter of public concern by the employee to a public body that the employee reasonably believes evidences:
1. A violation of any law.
2. Mismanagement, a gross waste of monies or an abuse of authority.
B. The disclosure by an employee to a public body alleging a violation of law, mismanagement, gross waste of monies or abuse of authority shall be in writing and shall contain the following information:
1. The date of the disclosure.
2. The name of the employee making the disclosure.
3. The nature of the alleged violation of law, mismanagement, gross waste of monies or abuse of authority.
4. If possible, the date or range of dates on which the alleged violation of law, mismanagement, gross waste of monies or abuse of authority occurred.
C. An employee who knowingly commits a prohibited personnel practice shall be ordered by the state personnel board, a community college district governing board, a school district governing board, a city or town personnel board, the attorney general's office if the employee is a law enforcement officer or any other appropriate independent personnel board established or authorized pursuant to section 38-534 to pay a civil penalty of up to $5,000 to the state general fund, a county general fund, a community college district unrestricted general fund, a school district maintenance and operation fund or a city or town general fund, whichever is appropriate. The employee who committed the prohibited personnel practice, not the governmental entity, shall pay the civil penalty. On a finding that an employee committed a prohibited personnel practice, the employer shall take appropriate disciplinary action, including dismissal, except that on a finding that an employee committed a prohibited personnel practice against an employee who disclosed information that the employee reasonably believed evidenced a violation of any law, the employee who knowingly committed the prohibited personnel practice is subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000, the employer shall dismiss the employee and the employee is barred from any future employment by the government governmental entity.
D. An employee or former employee against whom a prohibited personnel practice is committed may recover attorney fees, costs, back pay, general and special damages and full reinstatement for any reprisal resulting from the prohibited personnel practice as determined by the court.
E. An employee does not commit a prohibited personnel practice if he takes reprisal against an employee if that employee discloses information in a manner prohibited by law or the materials or information are prescribed as confidential by law.
F. This section may not be used as a defense in a disciplinary action where the employee is being disciplined for cause pursuant to section 41-773, except in a hearing on a complaint brought pursuant to this section by an employee or former employee who believes he the employee or former employee has been the subject of a prohibited personnel practice as prescribed in this section as the result of a disclosure of information.
G. On request or at any time an employee alleges reprisal, an employer shall provide an employee who is subject to disciplinary or corrective action, suspension, demotion or dismissal with a copy of this section.
H. If an employee or former employee believes that a personnel action taken against him the employee or former employee is the result of his the employee's or former employee's disclosure of information under this section, he the employee or former employee may make a complaint to an appropriate independent personnel board, if one is established or authorized pursuant to section 38-534, to the attorney general's office if the employee is a law enforcement officer or to a community college district governing board, school district governing board or city or town council. If an independent personnel board has not been established or authorized, or if a school district governing board, a community college district governing board or a city or town council does not hear and decide personnel matters brought pursuant to this section, the employee or former employee may make a complaint to the state personnel board. A complaint made pursuant to this subsection shall be made within ten working days after the effective date of the action taken against him the employee or former employee. The state personnel board, a school district governing board, a community college district governing board, the attorney general's office, a city or town council or any other appropriate independent personnel board shall, pursuant to the rules governing appeals under section 41-783, shall make a determination concerning:
1. The validity of the complaint.
2. Whether a prohibited personnel practice was committed against the employee or former employee as a result of disclosure of information by the employee or former employee.
I. If the state personnel board, a community college district governing board, a school district governing board, the attorney general's office if the employee is a law enforcement officer, a city or town council or any other appropriate independent personnel board established or authorized pursuant to section 38-534 determines that a prohibited personnel practice was committed as a result of disclosure of information by the employee or former employee, it shall rescind the personnel action and order that all lost pay and benefits be returned to the employee or former employee. The employee, former employee, employee alleged to have committed a prohibited personnel practice pursuant to subsection A of this section or employer may appeal the decision of the state personnel board, a community college district governing board, a school district governing board, a city or town council or any other appropriate independent personnel board established or authorized pursuant to section 38-534 to the superior court as provided in title 12, chapter 7, article 6.
J. For purposes of a hearing by the state personnel board, a school district governing board, a community college district governing board, the attorney general's office if the employee is a law enforcement officer, a city or town council or any other appropriate independent personnel board conducted under this section, the employee, former employee, employee alleged to have committed the prohibited personnel practice pursuant to subsection A of this section and employer may be represented by counsel. In addition, representation by counsel in such hearings shall meet any other requirements stipulated by the state personnel board, a school district governing board, a community college district governing board, a city or town council or any other appropriate independent personnel board or as required by law.
K. An employee or former employee may also seek injunctive relief as is otherwise available in civil actions. A court may award reasonable attorney fees to an employee or former employee who prevails in an action pursuant to this section, but the award of attorney fees shall not exceed $10,000.
L. This section shall does not be construed to limit or extend the civil or criminal liability of an employee or former employee for any disclosure of information or to limit an employee's right to a separate pretermination hearing with the employee's employer, as provided by law.
M. An employee who knowingly makes a false accusation that a public officer or employee who has control over personnel actions has engaged in a violation of any law, mismanagement, a gross waste of monies or an abuse of authority is personally subject to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 and dismissal from employment by the employer.
Sec. 2. Title 38, chapter 3, article 9, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 38-535, to read:
38-535. Law enforcement officers; attorney general investigations
Notwithstanding any other law, The attorney general shall investigate alleged violations of this article related to law enforcement officers.
