Bill Text: CA AB602 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Passed) 2019-10-03 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 491, Statutes of 2019. [AB602 Detail]

Download: California-2019-AB602-Amended.html

Amended  IN  Assembly  May 02, 2019
Amended  IN  Assembly  March 28, 2019

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill No. 602


Introduced by Assembly Member Berman

February 14, 2019


An act to add Section 1708.87 to the Civil Code, relating to deceptive recordings. An act to amend Section 1708.85 of the Civil Code, relating to privacy.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 602, as amended, Berman. Deceptive recordings: civil actions. Invasion of privacy: distribution of sexually explicit material.
Existing law creates a private right of action against a person who intentionally distributes a photograph, film, videotape, recording, or other reproduction of another that exposes the intimate body parts, as defined, of that person or shows that person engaged in specified sexual acts, without that person’s consent, knowing that the other person had a reasonable expectation that the material would remain private, if specified conditions are met.
Existing law allows specified persons to assert a cause of action for wrongful death.
This bill would expand the private right of action discussed above to include a case where the apparent subject of the distributed material is falsely depicted to be the subject as the result of manipulation, editing, or other alteration of the material if a reasonable person would believe that the altered material is authentic. The bill would further authorize a person who could assert a wrongful death action to assert a claim under the provisions discussed above and would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes.

Existing law creates a civil cause of action for using the name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness of another person, without their consent, in any manner, for the purpose of advertising, selling, or soliciting.

Existing law also creates a civil cause of action for capturing or attempting to capture, in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person, any type of image or recording of a person engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity.

This bill would make a person who creates a deceptive recording, as defined, with the intent to distribute the recording or who willfully distributes a deceptive recording that the person knows or reasonably should have known is a deceptive recording, knowing that the recording defames the subject of the recording, liable for general and special damages that are proximately caused by those actions. The bill would exempt from liability an internet service that hosts content that is uploaded or posted by parties that are not employed by or affiliated with the internet service, subject to certain conditions, and would make the bill’s provisions inapplicable to a broadcasting station, a regularly published newspaper, and specified others who broadcast or publish a deceptive recording for the purpose of disseminating newsworthy facts.

Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: NO   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 1708.85 of the Civil Code is amended to read:

1708.85.
 (a) A private cause of action for general or special damages, as defined in Section 48a, lies against a person who intentionally distributes by any means a photograph, film, videotape, recording, or any other reproduction of another, another person, without the other’s that person’s consent, if (1) the person knew that the other person had a reasonable expectation that the material would remain private, (2) the distributed material exposes an intimate body part of the other person, or shows the other person engaging in an act of intercourse, oral copulation, sodomy, or other act of sexual penetration, and (3) the other person suffers general or special damages as described in Section 48a. that exposes an intimate body part of the other person or shows the other person engaging in an act of intercourse, oral copulation, sodomy, or other act of sexual penetration in either of the following circumstances:
(1) (A) Except in a cause of action brought pursuant to subdivision (k), the subject of the photograph, film, videotape, recording, or other reproduction is the plaintiff.
(B) The distribution was made without the subject’s consent.
(C) The person who distributed the material knew, or should have known, that the subject of the material had a reasonable expectation that the material would remain private.
(2) (A) The apparent subject of the photograph, film, videotape, recording, or other reproduction is falsely depicted to be the subject of the material as the result of subsequent manipulation, editing, or other alteration of the material.
(B) A reasonable person would believe that the altered photograph, film, videotape, recording, or other reproduction, based upon its context and content, is authentic.
(b) As used in this section, “intimate body part” means any portion of the genitals, and, in the case of a female, also includes any portion of the breast below the top of the areola, that is uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing.
(c) There shall be no liability on the part of the person distributing material under subdivision (a) under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The distributed material was created under an agreement by the person appearing in subject of the material for its public use and distribution or otherwise intended by that person the subject for public use and distribution.
(2) The person possessing or viewing the distributed material has permission from the person appearing in the material to publish subject of the material to distribute the material by any means or post the material on an Internet Web site. internet website.
(3) The person appearing in subject of the material waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in the distributed material by making it accessible to the general public.
(4) The distributed material constitutes a matter of public concern.
(5) The distributed material referred to in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) was photographed, filmed, videotaped, recorded, or otherwise reproduced in a public place and under circumstances in which the person depicted subject of the material had no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(6) The distributed material was previously distributed by another person.
(7) The distributed material referred to in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) is satire or parody.
(d) In addition to any other relief available at law, the court may order equitable relief against the person violating subdivision (a), including a temporary restraining order, or a preliminary injunction or a permanent injunction ordering the defendant to cease distribution of material. The court may grant injunctive relief maintaining the confidentiality of a plaintiff using a pseudonym as provided in subdivision (f).
(e) The court may also grant, after holding a properly noticed hearing, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing plaintiff.
(f) (1) A plaintiff in a civil proceeding pursuant to subdivision (a), may proceed using a pseudonym, either John Doe, Jane Doe, or Doe, for the true name of the plaintiff and may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff. A plaintiff who proceeds using a pseudonym and excluding or redacting identifying characteristics as provided in this section shall file with the court and serve upon the defendant a confidential information form for this purpose that includes the plaintiff’s name and other identifying characteristics excluded or redacted. The court shall keep the plaintiff’s name and excluded or redacted characteristics confidential.
(2) In cases where a plaintiff proceeds using a pseudonym under this section, the following provisions shall apply:
(A) All other parties and their agents and attorneys shall use this pseudonym in all pleadings, discovery documents, and other documents filed or served in the action, and at hearings, trial, and other court proceedings that are open to the public.
(B) (i) Any party filing a pleading, discovery document, or other document in the action shall exclude or redact any identifying characteristics of the plaintiff from the pleading, discovery document, or other document, except for a confidential information form filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(ii) A party excluding or redacting identifying characteristics as provided in this section shall file with the court and serve upon all other parties a confidential information form that includes the plaintiff’s name and other identifying characteristics excluded or redacted. The court shall keep the plaintiff’s name and excluded or redacted characteristics confidential.
(C) All court decisions, orders, petitions, discovery documents, and other documents shall be worded so as to protect the name or other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff from public revelation.
(3) The following definitions apply to this subdivision:
(A) “Identifying characteristics” means name or any part thereof, address or any part thereof, city or unincorporated area of residence, age, marital status, relationship to defendant, and race or ethnic background, telephone number, email address, social media profiles, online identifiers, contact information, or any other information, including images of the plaintiff, from which the plaintiff’s identity can be discerned.
(B) “Online identifiers” means any personally identifying information or signifiers that would tie an individual to a particular electronic service, device, or Internet application, website, or platform account, including, but not limited to, access names, access codes, account names, aliases, avatars, credentials, gamer tags, display names, handles, login names, member names, online identities, pseudonyms, screen names, user accounts, user identifications, usernames, Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), domain names, Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, and media access control (MAC) addresses.
(4) The responsibility for excluding or redacting the name or identifying characteristics of the plaintiff from all documents filed with the court rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. Nothing in this section requires the court to review pleadings or other papers for compliance with this provision.
(5) Upon request of the plaintiff, the clerk shall allow access to the court file in an action filed under this section only as follows:
(A) To a party to the action, including a party’s attorney.
(B) To a person by order of the court on a showing of good cause for access.
(C) To any person 60 days after judgment is entered unless the court grants a plaintiff’s motion to seal records pursuant to Chapter 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Rules of Court.
(g) In an action pursuant to this section, the plaintiff shall state in the caption of the complaint “ACTION BASED ON CIVIL CODE SECTION 1708.85.”
(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter or negate any rights, obligations, or immunities of an interactive service provider under Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or preclude a plaintiff from securing or recovering any other available remedy.
(i) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
(j) The Judicial Council shall, on or before January 1, 2019, adopt or revise as appropriate rules and forms in order to implement subdivision (f).
(k) A person who may assert a cause of action under Section 377.60 of the Code of Civil Procedure may also assert a cause of action under this section.

SECTION 1.Section 1708.87 is added to the Civil Code, immediately following Section 1708.85, to read:
1708.87.

(a)A person who creates a deceptive recording with the intent to distribute the recording, knowing that the recording defames the subject of the recording, is liable for general and special damages that are proximately caused by the creation of the deceptive recording.

(b)A person who willfully distributes a deceptive recording that the person knows, or reasonably should have known, is a deceptive recording, knowing that the recording defames the subject of the recording, is liable for general and special damages that are proximately caused by the person’s willful distribution of the deceptive recording.

(c)An internet service that hosts content that is uploaded or posted by persons that are not employed by or affiliated with that internet service shall not be liable under this section for any deceptive recording viewable on that internet service that has been uploaded or posted by that person that is not employed by or affiliated with that internet service.

(d)This section shall not apply to a broadcasting station, including a cable or satellite television operation, programmer, or producer, an internet website, or a regularly published newspaper, magazine, or other periodical of general circulation, including an internet or electronic publication, that routinely carries news and commentary of general interest, and that broadcasts or publishes a deceptive recording for the purpose of disseminating newsworthy facts.

(e)As used in this section, “deceptive recording,” sometimes referred to as a “deepfake,” means any audio or video recording that has been created or altered in such a manner that it falsely appears to a reasonable observer to be an authentic recording of a person’s speech or actions. A deceptive recording does not include either of the following:

(1)A recording that is satire or parody.

(2)A recording that, because of context, content, or a clear disclosure, would not cause a reasonable person to believe that it is an authentic recording.

feedback