Bill Text: CA ACA3 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Introduced

California Assembly Constitutional Amendment 3

Introduced

Bill Title: Wealth tax: appropriation limits.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 10-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2023-03-30 - Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. [ACA3 Detail]

Download: California-2023-ACA3-Introduced.html

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Constitutional Amendment

No. 3

Introduced by Assembly Member Lee
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Kalra)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Wendy Carrillo, Haney, Jackson, Ortega, and Santiago)
(Coauthors: Senators Durazo, Gonzalez, and Smallwood-Cuevas)

January 19, 2023

A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 2 of Article XIII thereof, and by amending Section 1 of Article XIII B thereof, relating to public finance.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

ACA 3, as introduced, Lee. Wealth tax: appropriation limits.

The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to impose a property tax on any type of tangible personal property, shares of capital stock, evidences of indebtedness, and any interest therein not exempt from taxation pursuant to the California Constitution. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature, by two-thirds vote of the membership of each house, to classify such personal property for differential taxation or for exemption. The California Constitution limits taxation of certain specified personal property to no more than 0.4% of the value of such property, and limits the tax rate on personal property to no more than the tax rate on real property in the same jurisdiction.

This measure would authorize the Legislature to impose a tax upon all forms of personal property or wealth, whether tangible or intangible, and would require any tax so imposed to be administered and collected by the Franchise Tax Board and the Department of Justice, as determined by the Legislature in statute. The measure would authorize the Legislature to classify any form of personal property or wealth for differential taxation or for exemption by a majority vote.

The California Constitution generally prohibits the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and each local government from exceeding the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior fiscal year, adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population, and prescribes procedures for making adjustments to the appropriations limit.

This measure would remove the limitation on appropriations of the State and of local governments until such time as specified conditions are satisfied. The measure would provide that, upon satisfaction of these specified conditions, the level of appropriations made to achieve those conditions shall be set as the limitation on appropriations.

Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO

WHEREAS, The State has long-term needs that are not being met using existing revenue sources, including in education, health care, and infrastructure; and

WHEREAS, The State has new needs, such as the need for pandemic recovery and climate change resilience, that are also not being met; and

WHEREAS, Wealth inequality amongst California residents has increased dramatically over the past few decades; and

WHEREAS, California’s current tax system generally asks those with the greatest ability to pay and who benefit the most from the protections and services provided by the state’s legal and economic systems to pay more, except that the very wealthiest Californians typically pay less because California’s existing income tax is realization-based and consequently fails to adequately tax the investment income or wealth accumulations of California’s wealthiest residents; and

WHEREAS, A tax on extreme wealth will restore fairness to California’s tax system and raise significant revenue to meet new and existing urgent needs; and

WHEREAS, The State’s appropriations limit was crafted during another era and needs to be updated so that it restrains the size of state and local government and also permits the state and local government to meet their basic obligations in a changing and more challenging world; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Assembly, the Senate concurring, That the Legislature of the State of California at its 2023–24 Regular Session commencing on the fifth day of December 2022, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, hereby proposes to the people of the State of California that the Constitution of the State be amended as follows:

First—

That Section 2 of Article XIII thereof is amended to read:

SEC. 2.

~~The~~ (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution, the Legislature may provide for ~~property taxation of all forms of tangible personal property,~~ the taxation of all forms of personal property or wealth, whether tangible or intangible. Personal property or wealth that may be so taxed include, but are not limited to, shares of capital stock, evidences of indebtedness, and any legal or equitable interest ~~therein not exempt under any other provision of this article.~~ therein. The ~~Legislature, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring,~~ Legislature may classify such personal property or wealth for differential taxation or for exemption. The tax on any interest in notes, debentures, shares of capital stock, bonds, solvent credits, deeds of trust, or mortgages shall not exceed four-tenths of one percent of full value, and the tax per dollar of full value shall not be higher on personal property than on real property in the same taxing jurisdiction.

(b) Any tax on personal property or wealth imposed under the authority of this section on or after the effective date of the measure adding this subdivision shall be administered and collected by the Franchise Tax Board and the Department of Justice, as determined by the Legislature in statute.

Second—

That Section 1 of Article XIII B thereof is amended to read:

SEC. 1.

(a) The total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior year adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population, except as otherwise provided in this article.

(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the appropriations limit for the State and each local government shall not be deemed exceeded for any year unless at least two out of the three following conditions have been satisfied:
(1) The Director of Finance and the Superintendent of Public Instruction mutually determine that current annual expenditures per student are sufficient to place California in the top 10 states in terms of annual expenditures per student for elementary and high schools, and that California is among the top 10 states with the lowest average class size for elementary and high schools.
(2) The Controller and the State Public Health Officer mutually determine that California is among the 10 states with the lowest fraction of their population without health insurance.
(3) The Controller and the Department of Housing and Community Development mutually determine that California is no longer among the top 10 states with the highest percentage of households whose housing costs are in excess of 50 percent of the household’s income based on information compiled from the American Community Survey made available by the United States Census Bureau, or any substantially equivalent data.
(c) If the appropriations limit and at least two of the conditions of subdivision (b) are met for any year, then the level of appropriations made in the year that was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (b) in that year shall be the appropriations limit for both the State and local governments, adjusted according to the provisions of this article.