Bill Text: HI HB1600 | 2024 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating To Open Meetings.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 12-0)
Status: (Passed) 2024-05-03 - Act 013, 05/03/2024 (Gov. Msg. No. 1113). [HB1600 Detail]
Download: Hawaii-2024-HB1600-Introduced.html
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
1600 |
|
THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to open meetings.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that for
decades, the State's Sunshine Law has had an exception to the open meetings
requirement to permit a limited number of board members to investigate an
issue, without complying with opening meeting requirements, and report back to
the board before a discussion is made.
In such cases, the board must hold three meetings: first, to identify
the members and scope of the investigative group; second, for the investigative
group to report its findings to the board; and finally, for the board to
discuss and act on the investigative group's report. However, the legislature finds that over the
years there have been multiple occasions where boards have attempted to
circumvent the legislative intent that is aimed to allow sufficient time for
the public and the board have an opportunity to digest the investigative
group's report before any substantive discussion occurs by the board. Specifically, board's have circumvented this
legislative intent by separately noticing back-to-back meetings, first for the
investigative group to report to the board, and second for the board to act on
the report. Most recently, the Honolulu
city council attempted to schedule a meeting for an investigative group to
report back on its investigation into real property tax bills with a
"separate" meeting to discuss and act on the report scheduled for
thirty minutes after the investigative group reported to the council.
The purpose of this Act is to clarify that board meetings to discuss and act on an investigative group's report must occur at least six days after the investigative group has reported the results of its investigation to the board.
SECTION 2. Section 92-2.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) Two or more members of a board, but less than the number of members that would constitute a quorum for the board, may be assigned to:
(1) Investigate a matter relating to board business; provided that:
(A) The scope of the investigation and the scope of each member's authority are defined at a meeting of the board;
(B) All resulting findings and recommendations are presented to the board at a meeting of the board; and
(C) Deliberation and
decisionmaking on the matter investigated, if any, occurs only at a duly
noticed meeting of the board held [subsequent to] no less than six
calendar days after the meeting at which the findings and recommendations
of the investigation were presented to the board; or
(2) Present, discuss, or negotiate any position that the board has adopted at a meeting of the board; provided that the assignment is made and the scope of each member's authority is defined at a meeting of the board before the presentation, discussion, or negotiation."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
Report Title:
Sunshine Law; Permitted Interaction Groups; Scheduling; Open Meetings
Description:
Requires that a board may only schedule a meeting for discussion and decisionmaking on a report by an investigative group six days after the investigative group has made a report of its findings to the board.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
