Bill Text: MI HB5991 | 2011-2012 | 96th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: State; escheats; auditing standards and process; modify. Amends sec. 31 of 1995 PA 29 (MCL 567.251).

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-11-27 - Printed Bill Filed 11/09/2012 [HB5991 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2011-HB5991-Introduced.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOUSE BILL No. 5991

 

November 8, 2012, Introduced by Rep. Nesbitt and referred to the Committee on Tax Policy.

 

     A bill to amend 1995 PA 29, entitled

 

"Uniform unclaimed property act,"

 

by amending section 31 (MCL 567.251), as amended by 1997 PA 195.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 31. (1) The administrator may require a person who has

 

not filed a report under this act or a person who the administrator

 

believes has filed an inactive, incomplete, or false report, to

 

file a verified report in a form specified by the administrator.

 

The report shall state whether the person is holding any unclaimed

 

property reportable or deliverable under this act, describe

 

unclaimed property not previously reported or as to which the

 

administrator has made inquiry, and specifically identify and state

 

the amounts of property that may be in issue.

 


     (2) The administrator, at reasonable times and upon reasonable

 

notice, may examine the records of a person to determine whether

 

the person has complied with this act. The administrator may

 

conduct the examination even if the person believes he or she is

 

not in possession of any property reportable or deliverable under

 

this act. The administrator may contract with any other person to

 

conduct the examination on behalf of the administrator.

 

     (3) If a person is treated under section 13 as the holder of

 

the property only insofar as the interest of the business

 

association in the property is concerned, the administrator,

 

pursuant to subsection (2), may examine the records of the person

 

if the administrator has given the notice required by subsection

 

(2) to both the person and the business association at least 90

 

days before the examination.

 

     (4) Any examination performed by the administrator or his or

 

her duly authorized agents must be performed in accordance with the

 

generally accepted government auditing standards published by the

 

government accountability office of the United States government.

 

The administrator or his or her duly authorized agents may

 

determine the liability based upon the facts contained in the

 

report being audited or other information in the administrator's

 

possession.

 

     (5) The administrator or his or her duly authorized agents may

 

determine the liability based upon a reasonable statistical sample

 

or other sampling techniques consistent with generally accepted

 

government auditing standards in examining reports or records only

 

when the person being examined does not have complete records of

 


transactions or when the person being examined has adequate records

 

of transactions and both parties have agreed in writing to the use

 

such statistical sample or other sampling technique. However,

 

unless the administrator or his or her duly authorized agents have

 

documented reason to believe that any records maintained or reports

 

filed are inaccurate or incomplete, if the person being examined

 

has filed all the required reports and has maintained and preserved

 

adequate records, then all the following apply to the examination:

 

     (a) The examination shall include a review of the person's

 

books and records.

 

     (b) The examination shall not be based on a determination on

 

any indirect audit procedure.

 

     (c) The examination shall not extrapolate a determination

 

based on any indirect audit procedure.

 

     (6) When using an indirect audit procedure to support

 

examination determinations, both the credibility of the evidence

 

and the reasonableness of the conclusion must be evaluated before

 

the determination of tax liability is made. In addition, when using

 

an indirect audit procedure, the administrator and his or her duly

 

authorized agents shall follow the following guidelines:

 

     (a) The administrator and his or her duly authorized agents

 

may use any method to establish the examination determination.

 

     (b) The administrator and his or her duly authorized agents

 

may not be arbitrary in the use of the authority described in this

 

section.

 

     (c) The administrator and his or her duly authorized agents

 

may use an indirect method to test the accuracy of the taxpayer's

 


books and records.

 

     (d) The administrator and his or her duly authorized agents

 

shall investigate all reasonable evidence presented by the taxpayer

 

refuting the computation.

 

     (e) The administrator and his or her duly authorized agents

 

may use third-party records in the determination.

 

     (7) A person being examined by an indirect audit procedure may

 

challenge the accuracy of any method or test used by providing

 

clear and convincing evidence that the method or test is erroneous,

 

lacks a rational basis, or produces a different result when the

 

complete records are considered.

 

     (8) (4) If an examination of the records of a person results

 

in the disclosure of property reportable and deliverable under this

 

act, the administrator may assess the cost of the examination

 

against the holder at the rate of $50.00 a day for each examiner;

 

however, the charges shall not exceed the value of the property

 

found to be reportable and deliverable. The cost of examination

 

made pursuant to subsection (3) shall be imposed only against the

 

business association.

 

     (9) (5) If a holder fails after the effective date of this act

 

to maintain the records required by section 32 and the records of

 

the holder available for the periods subject to this act are

 

insufficient to permit the preparation of a report, the

 

administrator may require the holder to report and pay an amount as

 

may reasonably be estimated from any available records.

 

     (10) As used in this section:

 

     (a) "Circumstantial evidence" is evidence from which more than

 


1 logical conclusion can be reached.

 

     (b) "Indirect audit procedure" is an audit method that

 

involves the use of circumstantial evidence, including activity

 

from periods that accurate and complete records are available, to

 

determine any unclaimed property reportable or deliverable under

 

this act.

feedback