Bill Text: NC H786 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: North Carolina Highway Trust Fund Changes
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 4-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-04-07 - Ref to the Com on Transportation, if favorable, Appropriations [H786 Detail]
Download: North_Carolina-2011-H786-Amended.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
H 1
HOUSE BILL 786
Short Title: North Carolina Highway Trust Fund Changes. |
(Public) |
|
Sponsors: |
Representatives Blust and Hilton (Primary Sponsors). For a complete list of Sponsors, see Bill Information on the NCGA Web Site. |
|
Referred to: |
Transportation, if favorable, Appropriations. |
|
April 7, 2011
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to modify the authorization for the secretary of transportation to transfer funds from the highway trust fund and to provide a formula for transfer of funds to meet needs based on population or congestion and to revise the highway trust fund allocation formula.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 136‑176(b1) reads as rewritten:
"(b1) The Secretary may authorize the transfer of
funds allocated under subdivisions (1) through (4) of subsection (b) of this
section to other projects that are ready to be let and were to be funded from
allocations to those subdivisions. subdivisions and to projects for
congestion mitigation. The Secretary shall ensure that any funds
transferred pursuant to this subsection are repaid promptly and in any event in
no more than four years. The Secretary shall certify, prior to making any
transfer pursuant to this subsection, that the transfer will not affect the
delivery schedule of Highway Trust Fund projects in the current Transportation
Improvement Program. No transfers shall be allowed that do not conform to the
applicable provisions of the equity formula for distribution of funds, G.S. 136‑17.2A.
Transfers made for the purpose of mitigating or reducing congestion shall be made on the basis of either of the following:
(1) The ratio that the population the county or counties in which the project is located bears to the total State population.
(2) The need for reducing congestion on a roadway based on statewide ranking of projects determined by taking the average daily volume of vehicles divided by the design capacity and then multiplied by the accident rate of the facility divided by the statewide average accident rate for facilities of this type ((volume/capacity) x (accident rate of facility/statewide average accident rates for facilities of this type)).
The Secretary shall adjust the transfer of funds to make up for excess transfers that were previously done to attempt to promptly repay transfers made for purposes other than congestion mitigation.
If the Secretary authorizes a transfer pursuant to this subsection, the Secretary shall report that decision to the next regularly scheduled meetings of the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee, and to the Fiscal Research Division."
SECTION 2. G.S. 136‑17.2A(b) reads as rewritten:
"(b) Until ninety
percent (90%) of the mileage of the Intrastate System projects listed in G.S. 136‑179
is completed, theThe Secretary of Transportation shall, on or before
October 1 of each year, calculate the estimated amount of funds subject to this
section that will be available for the next seven program years beginning that
October 1. The Secretary shall then calculate a tentative percentage share for
each distribution region by multiplying the total estimated amount by a factor
that is based:
(1) Twenty‑five percent (25%) Fifty
percent (50%) on the estimated number of miles to complete the
Intrastate System projects in that distribution region compared to the
estimated number of miles to complete the total Intrastate System;vehicle
miles driven in that distribution region compared to the total vehicle miles
driven in the State.
(2) Fifty percent (50%) on the estimated
population of the distribution region compared to the total estimated
population of the State; and
(3) Twenty‑five percent (25%) on the fraction one‑seventh,
which provides an equal share based on the number of distribution regions.
Fifty percent (50%) on the need for reducing congestion on a roadway based on
statewide ranking of projects determined by taking the average daily volume of
vehicles divided by the design capacity and then multiplied by the accident
rate of the facility divided by the statewide average accident rate for
facilities of this type ((volume/capacity) x (accident rate of
facility/statewide average accident rates for facilities of this type))."
SECTION 3. G.S. 136‑17.2A(c) is repealed.
SECTION 4. G.S. 136‑17.2A(d) is repealed.
SECTION 5. G.S. 136‑17.2A(f) is repealed.
SECTION 6. G.S. 136‑17.2A(h) is repealed.
SECTION 7. This act is effective when it becomes law.