Bill Text: NC H877 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Ignition Interlock Req'd/All DWIs
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 8-5)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2016-06-14 - Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House [H877 Detail]
Download: North_Carolina-2015-H877-Amended.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2015
H 1
HOUSE BILL 877
|
Short Title: Ignition Interlock Req'd/All DWIs. |
(Public) |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Representatives Jordan, Faircloth, and Jackson (Primary Sponsors). For a complete list of Sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly Web Site. |
|
|
Referred to: |
Judiciary II, if favorable, Finance. |
|
April 15, 2015
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to require persons convicted of driving AFTER CONSUMING alcohol being less than twenty‑one years of age, and certain persons who refuse a chemical analysis or are convicted of driving while impaired or any other impaired driving offense, to have an ignition interlock system installed on every vehicle that person may drive before that person can get a limited driving PRIVILEGE; to remove the waiting period before a person may apply for a limited driving privilege; and to provide for the payment of an administrative fee and costs associated with an ignition interlock system and create an Ignition Interlock Device Fund to assist indigent persons.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 20‑16.2(c1) reads as rewritten:
"(c1) Procedure for Reporting Results and Refusal to
Division. – Whenever a person refuses to submit to a chemical analysis, a
person has an alcohol concentration of 0.150.08 or more, or a
person's drivers license has an alcohol concentration restriction and the
results of the chemical analysis establish a violation of the restriction, the
law enforcement officer and the chemical analyst shall without unnecessary
delay go before an official authorized to administer oaths and execute an
affidavit(s) stating that:
(1) The person was charged with an implied‑consent offense or had an alcohol concentration restriction on the drivers license;
(2) A law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person had committed an implied‑consent offense or violated the alcohol concentration restriction on the drivers license;
(3) Whether the implied‑consent offense charged involved death or critical injury to another person, if the person willfully refused to submit to chemical analysis;
(4) The person was notified of the rights in subsection (a); and
(5) The results of any tests given or that the person willfully refused to submit to a chemical analysis.
If the person's drivers license has an alcohol concentration restriction, pursuant to G.S. 20‑19(c3), and an officer has reasonable grounds to believe the person has violated a provision of that restriction other than violation of the alcohol concentration level, the officer and chemical analyst shall complete the applicable sections of the affidavit and indicate the restriction which was violated. The officer shall immediately mail the affidavit(s) to the Division. If the officer is also the chemical analyst who has notified the person of the rights under subsection (a), the officer may perform alone the duties of this subsection."
SECTION 2. G.S. 20‑16.2(e1) reads as rewritten:
"(e1) Limited Driving Privilege after Six Months
in Certain Instances. – A person whose driver's license has been revoked under
this section may apply for and a judge authorized to do so by this subsection
may issue a limited driving privilege if:if all of the following
requirements are met:
(1) At the time of the refusal the person held either a
valid drivers license or a license that had been expired for less than one year;year.
(2) At the time of the refusal, the person
had not within the preceding seven years been convicted of an offense involving
impaired driving;
(3) At the time of the refusal, the person
had not in the preceding seven years willfully refused to submit to a chemical
analysis under this section;
(4) The implied consent offense charged did not involve
death or critical injury to another person;person.
(5) The underlying charge for which the defendant was requested to submit to a chemical analysis has been finally disposed of:
a. Other than by conviction; or
b. By a conviction of impaired driving under G.S. 20‑138.1,
at a punishment level authorizing issuance of a limited driving privilege under
G.S. 20‑179.3(b), and the defendant has complied with at least one
of the mandatory conditions of probation listed for the punishment level under
which the defendant was sentenced;sentenced.
(6) Subsequent to the refusal the person has had no
unresolved pending charges for or additional convictions of an offense involving
impaired driving;driving.
(7) The person's license has been revoked for
at least six months for the refusal; and
(8) The person has obtained a substance abuse assessment from a mental health facility and successfully completed any recommended training or treatment program.
(9) All vehicles that the person will be authorized to drive have been equipped with a type of ignition interlock system approved by the Commissioner.
Except as modified in this subsection, the provisions of G.S. 20‑179.3 relating to the procedure for application and conduct of the hearing and the restrictions required or authorized to be included in the limited driving privilege apply to applications under this subsection. If the case was finally disposed of in the district court, the hearing shall be conducted in the district court district as defined in G.S. 7A‑133 in which the refusal occurred by a district court judge. If the case was finally disposed of in the superior court, the hearing shall be conducted in the superior court district or set of districts as defined in G.S. 7A‑41.1 in which the refusal occurred by a superior court judge. A limited driving privilege issued under this section authorizes a person to drive if the person's license is revoked solely under this section or solely under this section and G.S. 20‑17(2). If the person's license is revoked for any other reason, the limited driving privilege is invalid."
SECTION 3. G.S. 20‑16.5(p) reads as rewritten:
"(p) Limited Driving Privilege. – A person whose
drivers license has been revoked for a specified period of 30 or 45 days under
this section may apply for a limited driving privilege if:if all of
the following requirements are met:
(1) At the time of the alleged offense the person held
either a valid drivers license or a license that had been expired for less than
one year;year.
(2) Does not have an unresolved pending charge
involving impaired driving except the charge for which the license is currently
revoked under this section or additional convictions of an offense involving
impaired driving since being charged for the violation for which the license is
currently revoked under this section;section.
(3) The person's license has been revoked for
at least 10 days if the revocation is for 30 days or 30 days if the revocation
is for 45 days; and
(4) The person has obtained a substance abuse assessment from a mental health facility and registers for and agrees to participate in any recommended training or treatment program.
(5) All vehicles that the person will be authorized to drive have been equipped with a type of ignition interlock system approved by the Commissioner.
A person whose license has been indefinitely revoked under
this section may, after completion of 30 days under subsection (e) or the
applicable period of time under subdivision (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (f),
apply for a limited driving privilege. In the case of an indefinite revocation,
a judge of the division in which the current offense is pending may issue the
limited driving privilege only if the privilege is necessary to overcome
undue hardship and the person meets the eligibility requirements of G.S. 20‑179.3,
except that the requirements in G.S. 20‑179.3(b)(1)c. and G.S. 20‑179.3(e)
shall not apply. Except as modified in this subsection, the provisions of G.S. 20‑179.3
relating to the procedure for application and conduct of the hearing and the
restrictions required or authorized to be included in the limited driving
privilege apply to applications under this subsection. Any district court judge
authorized to hold court in the judicial district is authorized to issue such a
limited driving privilege. A limited driving privilege issued under this
section authorizes a person to drive if the person's license is revoked solely
under this section. If the person's license is revoked for any other reason,
the limited driving privilege is invalid."
SECTION 4. G.S. 20‑17.8 reads as rewritten:
"§ 20‑17.8. Restoration of a license after certain driving while impaired convictions; ignition interlock.
(a) Scope. – This section applies to a person whose license was revoked as a result of a conviction of driving while impaired, G.S. 20‑138.1, and:
(1) The person had an alcohol concentration of 0.15
or more;0.08 or more or refused to submit to a chemical analysis;
(2) The person has been convicted of another offense involving impaired driving, which offense occurred within seven years immediately preceding the date of the offense for which the person's license has been revoked; or
(3) The person was sentenced pursuant to G.S. 20‑179(f3).
For purposes of subdivision (1) of this subsection, the results of a chemical analysis, as shown by an affidavit or affidavits executed pursuant to G.S. 20‑16.2(c1), shall be used by the Division to determine that person's alcohol concentration.
(a1) Additional Scope. – This section applies to a person whose license was revoked as a result of a conviction of habitual impaired driving, G.S. 20‑138.5.
(a2) Under Age 21. – The provisions of this section apply to a person whose license was revoked as the result of a conviction of driving by a person less than 21 years old after consuming alcohol pursuant to G.S. 20‑138.3.
(b) Ignition Interlock Required. – Except as provided in subsection (l) of this section, when the Division restores the license of a person who is subject to this section, in addition to any other restriction or condition, it shall require the person to agree to and shall indicate on the person's drivers license the following restrictions for the period designated in subsection (c):
(1) A restriction that the person may operate only a vehicle that is equipped with a functioning ignition interlock system of a type approved by the Commissioner. The Commissioner shall not unreasonably withhold approval of an ignition interlock system and shall consult with the Division of Purchase and Contract in the Department of Administration to ensure that potential vendors are not discriminated against.
(2) A requirement that the person personally activate the ignition interlock system before driving the motor vehicle.
(3) An alcohol concentration restriction as follows:
a. If the ignition interlock system is required pursuant only to subdivision (a)(1) of this section, a requirement that the person not drive with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater;
b. If the ignition interlock system is required
pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, or subsection (a1) of
this section, a requirement that the person not drive with an alcohol
concentration of greater than 0.00; or0.02;
c. If the ignition interlock system is required
pursuant to subdivision (a)(1) of this section, and the person has also been
convicted, based on the same set of circumstances, of: (i) driving while
impaired in a commercial vehicle, G.S. 20‑138.2, (ii) driving while
less than 21 years old after consuming alcohol or drugs, G.S. 20‑138.3,
(iii) a violation of G.S. 20‑141.4, or (iv) manslaughter or
negligent homicide resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle when the
offense involved impaired driving, a requirement that the person not drive with
an alcohol concentration of greater than 0.00.0.02; or
d. If the ignition interlock system is required pursuant to subsection (a2) of this section, a requirement that the person not drive with an alcohol concentration greater than 0.02.
…
(e1) Disabling or Removing of Ignition Interlock System. – If an ignition interlock system is disabled or removed from a vehicle in which it is required to be installed pursuant to subsection (c1) of this section, the Division shall revoke the drivers license of the person subject to the provisions of this section and shall provide notice in accordance with G.S. 20‑48.
…
(g) Effect of Violation of Restriction When Driving While License Revoked Not Charged. – A person subject to this section who violates any of the restrictions of this section, or who disables or removes an ignition interlock system required by this section, but is not charged or convicted of driving while license revoked pursuant to G.S. 20‑28(a), shall have the person's license revoked by the Division for a period of one year.
…
(j) Right to Hearing Before Division; Issues. – If the person's license is revoked pursuant to subsection (g) of this section, before the effective date of the order issued under subsection (i) of this section, the person may request in writing a hearing before the Division. Except for the time referred to in G.S. 20‑16.5, if the person shows to the satisfaction of the Division that the person's license was surrendered to the court and remained in the court's possession, then the Division shall credit the amount of time for which the license was in the possession of the court against the revocation period required by subsection (g) of this section. If the person properly requests a hearing, the person retains the person's license, unless it is revoked under some other provision of law, until the hearing is held, the person withdraws the request, or the person fails to appear at a scheduled hearing. The hearing officer may subpoena any witnesses or documents that the hearing officer deems necessary. The person may request the hearing officer to subpoena the charging officer, the chemical analyst, or both to appear at the hearing if the person makes the request in writing at least three days before the hearing. The person may subpoena any other witness whom the person deems necessary, and the provisions of G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 45, apply to the issuance and service of all subpoenas issued under the authority of this section. The hearing officer is authorized to administer oaths to witnesses appearing at the hearing. The hearing must be conducted in the county where the charge was brought, except when the evidence of the violation is an alcohol concentration report from an ignition interlock system, the hearing may be conducted in the county where the person resides. The hearing must be limited to consideration of whether:
(1) The drivers license of the person had an ignition interlock requirement; and
(2) The person:
a. Was driving a vehicle that was not equipped with a
functioning ignition interlock system; orsystem;
b. Did not personally activate the ignition interlock
system before driving the vehicle; orvehicle;
c. Drove the vehicle in violation of an applicable
alcohol concentration restriction prescribed by subdivision (b)(3) of this section.section;
or
d. Allowed an ignition interlock system required by this section to be disabled or removed.
If the Division finds that the conditions specified in this subsection are met, it must order the revocation sustained. If the Division finds that the condition of subdivision (1) is not met, or that none of the conditions of subdivision (2) are met, it must rescind the revocation. If the revocation is sustained, the person must surrender the person's license immediately upon notification by the Division. If the revocation is sustained, the person may appeal the decision of the Division pursuant to G.S. 20‑25.
…."
SECTION 5. G.S. 20‑138.3(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) Limited Driving Privilege. – A person who is
convicted of violating subsection (a) of this section and whose drivers license
is revoked solely based on that conviction may apply for a limited driving
privilege as provided in G.S. 20‑179.3. This subsection shall apply
only if the person meets both each of the following requirements:
(1) Is 18, 19, or 20 years old on the date of the offense.
(2) Has not previously been convicted of a violation of this section.
(3) Has equipped all vehicles to be operated under a limited driving privilege with approved ignition interlock systems.
The judge may issue the limited driving privilege only if the person meets the eligibility requirements of G.S. 20‑179.3, other than the requirement in G.S. 20‑179.3(b)(1)c. G.S. 20‑179.3(e) shall not apply. All other terms, conditions, and restrictions provided for in G.S. 20‑179.3 shall apply. G.S. 20‑179.3, rather than this subsection, governs the issuance of a limited driving privilege to a person who is convicted of violating subsection (a) of this section and of driving while impaired as a result of the same transaction."
SECTION 6. G.S. 20‑179.3(b) reads as rewritten:
"(b) Eligibility. –
(1) A person convicted of the offense of impaired driving under G.S. 20‑138.1 is eligible for a limited driving privilege if:
a. At the time of the offense he held either a valid
driver's license or a license that had been expired for less than one year;year.
b. At the time of the offense he had not within the
preceding seven years been convicted of an offense involving impaired driving;driving.
c. Punishment Level Three, Four, or Five was imposed
for the offense of impaired driving;driving.
d. Subsequent to the offense he has not been convicted
of, or had an unresolved charge lodged against him for, an offense involving
impaired driving; anddriving.
e. The person has obtained and filed with the court a substance abuse assessment of the type required by G.S. 20‑17.6 for the restoration of a drivers license.
f. The person has installed an approved ignition interlock system on all vehicles subject to ignition interlock requirements to be operated by the applicant under a limited driving privilege.
A person whose North Carolina driver's license is revoked because of a conviction in another jurisdiction substantially similar to impaired driving under G.S. 20‑138.1 is eligible for a limited driving privilege if he would be eligible for it had the conviction occurred in North Carolina. Eligibility for a limited driving privilege following a revocation under G.S. 20‑16.2(d) is governed by G.S. 20‑16.2(e1)."
SECTION 7. G.S. 20‑179.3(g5) reads as rewritten:
"(g5) Ignition Interlock Required. – If a person's
drivers license is revoked for a conviction of G.S. 20‑138.1, and
the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.150.08 or more, or
refused to submit to a chemical analysis, a judge shall include all of the
following in a limited driving privilege order:
(1) A restriction that the applicant may operate only a designated motor vehicle.
(2) A requirement that the designated motor vehicle be
equipped with a functioning ignition interlock system of a type approved by the
Commissioner, which is set to prohibit driving with an alcohol concentration of
greater than 0.00.0.02. The Commissioner shall not unreasonably
withhold approval of an ignition interlock system and shall consult with the
Division of Purchase and Contract in the Department of Administration to ensure
that potential vendors are not discriminated against.
(3) A requirement that the applicant personally activate the ignition interlock system before driving the motor vehicle.
For purposes of this subsection, the results of a chemical analysis presented at trial or sentencing shall be sufficient to prove a person's alcohol concentration, shall be conclusive, and shall not be subject to modification by any party, with or without approval by the court."
SECTION 8. Article 3 of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
"§ 20‑179.5. Ignition interlock; administrative fee and costs for installation and monitoring; Ignition Interlock Device Fund.
(a) The costs incurred in order to comply with the ignition interlock requirements imposed by the court pursuant to this Article, including costs for installation and monitoring of the ignition interlock system, shall be paid by the person ordered to install the system. The person also shall pay an ignition interlock administrative fee in an amount which shall be determined by the Division and which shall be no less than thirty dollars ($30.00) nor more than sixty dollars ($60.00). The administrative fee shall be collected at the time of installation by the vendor installing the ignition interlock system. Costs for installation and monitoring of the ignition interlock system shall be collected under terms agreed upon by the vendor and the person required to install the ignition interlock system.
(b) The vendor shall remit fees collected pursuant to subsection (a) of this section to the Division on a quarterly basis. Fifty percent (50%) of the fees collected shall be used to pay costs incurred by the Division in administering the interlock program; the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the fees shall be deposited in the Ignition Interlock Device Fund.
(c) There is created in the Department of Transportation the Ignition Interlock Device Fund to be used for the purpose of installing and removing the ignition interlock systems of persons deemed by the court to be indigent. If the court determines that the convicted person is unable to pay for the installation of an ignition interlock system, the court may order that the Division pay the cost of installation out of the Ignition Interlock Device Fund, provided the person agrees to pay the required costs for monitoring the system."
SECTION 9. This act becomes effective December 1, 2015, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
