Bill Text: NY A01881 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to preventing the suppression of evidence where the police have acted in good faith
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 14-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-01-06 - referred to codes [A01881 Detail]
Download: New_York-2009-A01881-Introduced.html
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 1881 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 14, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. CALHOUN, ALFANO, CROUCH, KOLB, TOWNSEND -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. BACALLES, BUTLER, CONTE, ERRIGO, FINCH, MILLER, OAKS, SAYWARD, TEDISCO -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to preventing the suppression of evidence where the police have acted in good faith THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Section 710.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by 2 chapter 8 of the laws of 1976, subdivision 2 as amended and subdivision 3 7 as added by chapter 744 of the laws of 1988, subdivision 3 as amended 4 by chapter 214 of the laws of 1982, subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 5 629 of the laws of 1998 and subdivision 6 as renumbered by chapter 481 6 of the laws of 1983, is amended to read as follows: 7 S 710.20 Motion to suppress evidence; in general; grounds for. 8 Upon motion of a defendant who (a) is aggrieved by unlawful or improp- 9 er acquisition of evidence and has reasonable cause to believe that such 10 may be offered against him OR HER in a criminal action, or (b) claims 11 that improper identification testimony may be offered against him OR HER 12 in a criminal action, a court may, under circumstances prescribed in 13 this article, order that such evidence be suppressed or excluded upon 14 the ground that it: 15 1. Consists of tangible property obtained by means of an unlawful 16 search and seizure under circumstances precluding admissibility thereof 17 in a criminal action against such defendant; or 18 2. Consists of a record or potential testimony reciting or describing 19 declarations, conversations, or other communications overheard, inter- 20 cepted, accessed, or recorded by means of eavesdropping, or observations 21 made by means of video surveillance, obtained under circumstances 22 precluding admissibility thereof in a criminal action against such 23 defendant; or EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD02219-01-9 A. 1881 2 1 3. Consists of a record or potential testimony reciting or describing 2 a statement of such defendant involuntarily made, within the meaning of 3 section 60.45; or 4 4. Was obtained as a result of other evidence obtained in a manner 5 described in subdivisions one, two and three; or 6 5. Consists of a chemical test of the defendant's blood administered 7 in violation of the provisions of subdivision three of section eleven 8 hundred ninety-four of the vehicle and traffic law, subdivision eight of 9 section forty-nine-a of the navigation law, subdivision seven of section 10 25.24 of the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, or any 11 other applicable law; or 12 6. Consists of potential testimony regarding an observation of the 13 defendant either at the time or place of the commission of the offense 14 or upon some other occasion relevant to the case, which potential testi- 15 mony would not be admissible upon the prospective trial of such charge 16 owing to an improperly made previous identification of the defendant by 17 the prospective witness[.]; OR 18 7. Consists of information obtained by means of a pen register or trap 19 and trace device installed or used in violation of the provisions of 20 article seven hundred five of this chapter. 21 NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE 22 SUPPRESSED IF THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE THAT SUCH EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED 23 BY POLICE OFFICERS WHO WERE ACTING IN GOOD FAITH IN ATTEMPTING TO COMPLY 24 WITH THE LAW WHEN THEY OBTAINED SUCH EVIDENCE. 25 S 2. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed- 26 ing the date on which it shall have become a law.