Bill Text: NY S01118 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Decreases from 90% to 87 1/2%, the maximum state assistance for agricultural nonpoint source abatement and control projects; authorizes assistance to such projects which evaluate the effectiveness of emerging or existing best management practices; authorizes the setting aside of 10% of monies appropriated for state assistance for projects which exhibit special regional or statewide significance.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-01-06 - REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION [S01118 Detail]

Download: New_York-2009-S01118-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         1118
                              2009-2010 Regular Sessions
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                   January 26, 2009
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sen.  MARCELLINO  -- read twice and ordered printed, and
         when printed to be committed to the Committee on Environmental Conser-
         vation
       AN ACT to amend the  soil  and  water  conservation  districts  law,  in
         relation to funding agricultural nonpoint source abatement and control
         projects
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1.  Subdivisions 3 and 5 of section 11-b of the soil and water
    2  conservation districts law, subdivision 3 as amended by chapter  136  of
    3  the laws of 2000 and subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 413 of the laws
    4  of 1996, are amended to read as follows:
    5    3.  In  awarding  grants the committee shall give preference [to those
    6  projects located in priority water bodies identified pursuant to section
    7  17-1407 of the environmental conservation law. The committee shall  also
    8  give  preference]  to  projects  proposed  to  promote  participation or
    9  further the priorities  of  the  agricultural  environmental  management
   10  (AEM)  program  as  set forth in article eleven-A of the agriculture and
   11  markets law.
   12    5. State assistance payments pursuant to this section shall be up to a
   13  maximum of seventy-five percent of the  eligible  costs,  as  determined
   14  pursuant  to  subdivision  four  of section 17-1409 of the environmental
   15  conservation law, for any  specified  project.  Such  maximum  shall  be
   16  increased  by a percentage equal to the percentage of the total eligible
   17  costs for such specified projects that are contributed by the  owner  or
   18  operator of agricultural land upon which such specified project is being
   19  conducted,  provided,  however, that in no event shall the total of such
   20  state assistance payments  exceed  [ninety]  EIGHTY-SEVEN  AND  ONE-HALF
   21  percent of such eligible costs for any specified project.
   22    S  2. Section 11-b of the soil and water conservation districts law is
   23  amended by adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows:
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD06995-01-9
       S. 1118                             2
    1    8. THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS UPON THE RECOMMENDATION
    2  OF THE COMMITTEE MAY SET ASIDE UP TO TEN PERCENT OF ANY MONEYS APPROPRI-
    3  ATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION FOR AGRICULTURAL  NONPOINT  SOURCE
    4  ABATEMENT  AND  CONTROL PROJECTS THAT EXHIBIT SPECIAL REGIONAL OR STATE-
    5  WIDE  SIGNIFICANCE  AND MEET THE PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ESTAB-
    6  LISHED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION. SUCH  PROJECTS  MAY  INCLUDE,
    7  BUT  NOT BE LIMITED TO, PROJECTS INVOLVING THE PROMOTION OF CONSERVATION
    8  BUFFERS; PREVENTATIVE BEST MANAGEMENT  PRACTICES;  PESTICIDE  MANAGEMENT
    9  PRACTICES TO REDUCE RUNOFF; FIELD LEVEL AGRONOMIC PRACTICES; AND CONCEN-
   10  TRATED  ANIMAL  FEEDING  OPERATION COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE.  SUCH PROJECTS
   11  SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE AEM PREFERENCE AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION THREE
   12  OF THIS SECTION.
   13    S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback