Bill Text: NY S02571 | 2023-2024 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Adds additional offenses where there is concurrent jurisdiction of criminal and family courts; defines "unreciprocated offensive contact".

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2024-01-03 - REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES [S02571 Detail]

Download: New_York-2023-S02571-Introduced.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          2571

                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions

                    IN SENATE

                                    January 23, 2023
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by  Sens.  GOUNARDES,  FERNANDEZ  --  read twice and ordered
          printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Children
          and Families

        AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to  concurrent  juris-
          diction of criminal and family courts

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 812 of the family  court  act,  as
     2  amended  by  chapter  326  of the laws of 2008, the opening paragraph as
     3  amended by chapter 109 of the laws  of  2019,  is  amended  to  read  as
     4  follows:
     5    1.  Jurisdiction.  The family court and the criminal courts shall have
     6  concurrent jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which  would
     7  constitute  disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
     8  an intimate image, unlawful surveillance in the first  degree,  unlawful
     9  surveillance  in  the  second degree, unlawful surveillance in the third
    10  degree, dissemination of unlawful  surveillance  in  the  first  degree,
    11  dissemination  of  unlawful  surveillance in the second degree, criminal
    12  impersonation in the second degree, computer trespass, unauthorized  use
    13  of  a computer, harassment in the first degree, harassment in the second
    14  degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree,  sexual  misconduct,
    15  forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual abuse in the
    16  second  degree  as set forth in subdivision one of section 130.60 of the
    17  penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the second  degree,
    18  stalking  in  the  third degree, stalking in the fourth degree, criminal
    19  mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in the  third  degree,
    20  reckless endangerment, criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circu-
    21  lation,  strangulation  in the second degree, strangulation in the first
    22  degree, assault in the second degree, assault in the  third  degree,  an
    23  attempted assault, identity theft in the first degree, identity theft in
    24  the  second degree, identity theft in the third degree, grand larceny in

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD06938-01-3

        S. 2571                             2

     1  the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree,  coercion  in  the
     2  second  degree  or coercion in the third degree as set forth in subdivi-
     3  sions one, two and three of section 135.60  of  the  penal  law  between
     4  spouses  or  former  spouses,  or  between  parent  and child or between
     5  members of the same family or household except that  if  the  respondent
     6  would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant to section
     7  30.00  of  the  penal  law,  then  the family court shall have exclusive
     8  jurisdiction over such  proceeding.    Notwithstanding  a  complainant's
     9  election  to  proceed  in  family court, the criminal court shall not be
    10  divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceeding pursuant to
    11  this section. In any proceeding pursuant to this article, a court  shall
    12  not  deny  an  order of protection, or dismiss a petition, solely on the
    13  basis that the acts or events alleged are not relatively contemporaneous
    14  with the date of the petition, the conclusion of the fact-finding or the
    15  conclusion of the dispositional hearing. For purposes of  this  article,
    16  "disorderly  conduct" includes disorderly conduct not in a public place.
    17  For purposes of this article, "members of the same family or  household"
    18  shall mean the following:
    19    (a) persons related by consanguinity or affinity;
    20    (b) persons legally married to one another;
    21    (c) persons formerly married to one another regardless of whether they
    22  still reside in the same household;
    23    (d)  persons  who  have  a  child in common regardless of whether such
    24  persons have been married or have lived together at any time; [and]
    25    (e) persons who are not related by consanguinity or affinity  and  who
    26  are  or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether such
    27  persons have lived together at any time. Factors the court may  consider
    28  in  determining  whether  a  relationship  is an "intimate relationship"
    29  include but are not limited to: the  nature  or  type  of  relationship,
    30  regardless of whether the relationship is sexual in nature; the frequen-
    31  cy of interaction between the persons; and the duration of the relation-
    32  ship.  Neither a casual acquaintance nor ordinary fraternization between
    33  two individuals in business  or  social  contexts  shall  be  deemed  to
    34  constitute an "intimate relationship"[.]; and
    35    (f) persons who are not related by consanguinity, affinity, or intima-
    36  cy  and  who are or have been party to unreciprocated offensive contact.
    37  "Unreciprocated offensive contact" shall be  defined  as  a  pattern  of
    38  communication or activity wherein one person (the respondent) is engaged
    39  in primarily one-sided assaultive or threatening conduct and/or a course
    40  of  repeated,  unwelcome  communication  at or about another person (the
    41  petitioner). Factors the court may consider in  determining  whether  an
    42  alleged offender is engaging in unreciprocated offensive contact include
    43  but  are  not  limited  to:  the  extent to which the petitioner has not
    44  consented to such contact, the volume and frequency of such  contact  by
    45  the  respondent,  the coercive, threatening, and/or harassing content of
    46  any communications sent by the respondent, and  the  seriousness  and/or
    47  one-sidedness of such contact.
    48    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback