Bill Text: CA AB2506 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Property taxation: local exemption: possessory interests: publicly owned housing.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-04-29 - In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. [AB2506 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB2506-Introduced.html
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 2506
| Introduced by Assembly Member Lowenthal |
February 13, 2024 |
An act to add Sections 155.30 and 167.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2506, as introduced, Lowenthal.
Property taxation: local exemption: possessory interests: publicly owned housing.
The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to authorize, pursuant to a 2/3 vote of the Legislature, county boards of supervisors to exempt real property having a full value so low that, if not exempt, the total taxes and applicable subventions on the property would amount to less than the cost of assessing and collecting them. Existing property tax law sets forth procedures for a county board of supervisors to make that exemption for such property.
Existing property tax law requires that all property subject to tax be assessed at its full cash value, and includes certain possessory interests among those property interests that are subject to tax.
This bill would authorize a county board of
supervisors to exempt from property taxation any possessory interest held by a tenant of publicly owned housing, as defined, with a value so low that the total taxes and applicable subventions on the property would amount to less than the cost of assessing and collecting them, except as provided. The bill would provide that there is a rebuttable presumption that the property taxes and applicable subventions on a possessory interest held by a tenant in publicly owned housing are less than the costs of assessing and collecting those taxes and applicable subventions. The bill would set forth procedures for granting or denying those exemptions and for implementing the exemption. The bill would provide that the board shall be deemed to have agreed with the rebuttable presumption and the exemption shall be deemed granted if the board does not take any action, if the board agrees, by a majority vote, to grant the exemption at a public hearing, or if the board fails to reach a majority vote for or against the
exemption at the public hearing. By imposing additional duties on county boards of supervisors and local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing property tax law provides that there is a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof in favor of the taxpayer or assessee who has supplied all information as required by law to the assessor in any administrative hearing involving the imposition of a tax on an owner-occupied single-family dwelling, the assessment of an owner-occupied single-family dwelling as specified, or the appeal of an escape assessment.
This bill would provide that there is a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof in favor of a taxpayer or assessee who is a tenant in publicly owned housing, as defined, in any administrative hearing involving the disputed existence or value of a possessory interest alleged to be held by that tenant.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation.
This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax
revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill.
This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Digest Key
Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YESBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) California has a housing supply and affordability crisis of historic proportions which is compounding inequality and limiting advancement opportunities for many Californians.
(b) The majority of California renters, who represent more than 3,000,000 households, pay more than 30 percent of their income toward rent. Nearly one-third of renters, who represent more than 1,500,000 households, pay more than 50 percent of their income towards rent.
(c) There is continued need for housing at all income levels, including missing middle-income housing that
will provide a variety of housing options and configurations to allow every Californian to live near where they work. Expanding the availability of government-owned housing, including those own through Joint Powers Agreements (JPAs) formed by local government entities is an important part of the strategy to provide adequate low- and moderate-income rental residential opportunities.
(d) Since the New Deal era, when the California Supreme Court concluded in Housing Authority of Los Angeles County v. Dockweiler (1939) 14 Cal.2d 437, that publicly owned affordable housing projects are public uses and purposes, publicly owned affordable housing has served as a partial solution to the unaffordability of housing in California.
(e) Publicly owned affordable housing projects are exempt from property taxation under Section 3 of Article XIII of the California Constitution. Possessory
interests in publicly owned property, however, are generally subject to property taxation.
(f) The imposition of a property tax, however modest, on tenants of publicly owned housing directly contradicts and interferes with the achievement of the important governmental housing goals discussed above.
(g) For over 40 years it had been the consistent opinion of the State Board of Equalization that tenants of government-owned housing are not subject to property taxes on their occupancy because it would defeat the purpose of publicly owned affordable housing and undercut the property tax exemption under Section 3 of Article XIII of the California Constitution.
(h) During this period, the board’s consistent policy has been applied to residents of property exempt under the welfare and the college exemptions, including
housing for elderly persons, hospital staff, and college and university staff, and to residents of public housing.
(i) Relying on the board’s longstanding interpretation of the law, and on the statements of the California Supreme Court in California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. Rank (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1, 23 that a longstanding, consistent interpretation of the constitution by the administrative agency charged with its administration is to be afforded great weight, the Legislature adopts and endorses the reasoning of the conclusions of the board as expressed in Letter to Assessors 80/48 (1980), Annotations 660.0225 (1988) and 660.0155 (2010), and the documents contained therein. It is the intent of the Legislature to clarify that under existing law, the tenancies in publicly owned affordable housing and other publicly owned housing occupied by public beneficiaries are not subject to property taxation.
(j) Section 7 of Article XIII of the California Constitution states that the Legislature may authorize county boards of supervisors to exempt property where the property taxes due on that property are less than the costs of assessing and collecting those taxes. In that capacity, the Legislature also finds and declares that even if a tenant in publicly owned housing has a property interest in the dwelling unit they occupy, there are unique circumstances which affect both the value of any such interest as well as the costs of assessing and collecting property taxes on that property. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, the reasonably short-term nature of the interest, the rental income stream which is fixed at submarket rates by the government entity owning the property and the fact that any taxes due from a tenant would not be secured by a lien on real property which makes collection more costly in the event of a default.
(k) For these reasons, the Legislature finds and determines that a statute concerning these issues as they relate to tenants of publicly owned housing is needed.
SEC. 2.
Section 155.30 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read:155.30.
(a) (1) Notwithstanding any law and subject to the limitations of this section, a county board of supervisors may exempt from property taxation any possessory interest held by a tenant of publicly owned housing with a value so low that the total taxes and applicable subventions on the property would amount to less than the cost of assessing and collecting them.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the board shall not exempt possessory interests with a total base year value, as adjusted by an annual inflation factor pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 110.1, or full value of more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000).
(b) Notwithstanding Section 155.20 and
subject to the limitations in this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the property taxes and applicable subventions on a possessory interest held by a tenant in publicly owned housing are less than the costs of assessing and collecting those taxes and applicable subventions.
(c) A county board of supervisors may grant an exemption for a possessory interest pursuant to this section as follows:
(1) By inaction. If the board does not hold a public hearing pursuant to paragraph (2) and does not take a vote to apply, or to deny the application of, the exemption under this section to the possessory interest at issue, then the board shall be deemed to have agreed with the presumption described in subdivision (b) and the exemption shall be deemed granted by the board with respect to the possessory interest.
(2) By action. Alternatively, on or before the lien date the board shall consider in a public hearing whether to apply the exemption under this section to the possessory interest. The county shall provide sufficient prior notice of the public hearing and provide an opportunity for the public to be heard at the hearing. A majority vote of the board shall be required to apply or to decline to apply the exemption described in subdivision (b) to the possessory interest. However, if the board takes a vote pursuant to this paragraph but fails to reach a majority vote either in favor of or against the application of the exemption for the possessory interest, the board shall be deemed to have agreed with the presumption described in subdivision (b) and the exemption shall be deemed granted by the board with respect to the possessory interest.
(d) If the board holds a hearing pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and votes to deny
the exemption for a possessory interest of a tenant in publicly owned housing, prior to the assessor enrolling the possessory interest, the county assessor shall send, by registered United States Mail, notice to each applicable tenant that does all of the following:
(1) Informs the tenant of the county’s intention to impose property tax on their possessory interest.
(2) Displays the valuation proposed to be assessed by the assessor and the methodology to support the proposed value.
(3) Provides information regarding the assessment appeals process for contesting both the existence of a possessory interest and the valuation of any such interest.
(e) If the board grants the exemption for the possessory interest, as described in subdivision (c), the
following apply:
(1) In administering the exemption authorized by this section, the assessor shall not enroll the tenant’s possessory interest on the assessment roll.
(2) The exemption shall apply to lien dates following the granting of the exemption for the possessory interest and may, at the option of the board, continue in effect for succeeding fiscal years. Any revision or rescission of the exemption shall be adopted by the board on or before the lien date for the fiscal year to which that revision or rescission is to apply.
(3) The exemption of possessory interests held by tenants in publicly owned housing pursuant to this section shall apply to all open property tax years and shall apply prior to any regular property tax assessments of tenant possessory interests in publicly owned housing made pursuant to
Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2601) of Part 5 and prior to escape assessments of possessory interests to tenants of publicly owned housing issued pursuant to Section 531, whether placed on the regular or supplemental roll or on the secured or unsecured roll.
(f) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) “Board” means a county board of supervisors.
(2) “Costs of assessing and collecting” shall include, but are not limited to, the costs to the assessor’s and treasurer-tax collector’s office for potential administrative disputes before an assessment appeals board to contest the existence or value of a possessory interest by the tenant, determination of value in accordance with this section, the cost of notifying each residential tenant of the county’s intent to assess property taxes as
required by this section, the costs of the treasurer-tax collector in preparing and sending a tax bill, and a reasonable estimate of potential legal or other costs and risks of noncollection of property taxes from residential tenants because the taxes are not secured by a lien on property and because of the limited financial resources of the tenant.
(3) “Property taxes and applicable subventions” shall not include any non-ad valorem property taxes or similar charges based on ownership of a residential possessory interest in publicly owned housing.
(4) “Publicly owned housing” means an apartment or condominium multifamily residential project that is owned, as of January 1, 2025, by an agency that is exempt from property taxation under either subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article XIII of the California Constitution.
(5) “Tenant” means the occupant of a residential unit in publicly owned housing. “Tenant” shall not include holders of a commercial lease of real property in publicly owned housing.
(6) “Value” means the valuation of the possessory interest as determined by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) of Section 21 of Chapter 1 of Division 1 of Title 18 of the California Code of Regulations, as that section read on January 1, 2023, where the term of possession is conclusively presumed to be the stated term of possession in the lease agreement plus any express options for the tenant to unilaterally extend the lease that are part of the written lease agreement, and where the rent to be capitalized is the contract rent paid by the tenant over the term of possession.
