Bill Text: MI HB4223 | 2009-2010 | 95th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Land use; land division; landlocked cemeteries; prohibit in platting process. Amends secs. 109 & 182 of 1967 PA 288 (MCL 560.109 & 560.182).
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 5-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2009-02-11 - Printed Bill Filed 02/11/2009 [HB4223 Detail]
Download: Michigan-2009-HB4223-Introduced.html
HOUSE BILL No. 4223
February 10, 2009, Introduced by Reps. Ebli, Geiss, Valentine, Donigan and Angerer and referred to the Committee on Intergovernmental and Regional Affairs.
A bill to amend 1967 PA 288, entitled
"Land division act,"
by amending sections 109 and 182 (MCL 560.109 and 560.182), section
109 as amended by 1997 PA 87.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 109. (1) A municipality shall approve or disapprove a
proposed division within 45 days after the filing of a complete
application for the proposed division with the assessor or other
municipally designated official. However, a municipality with a
population of 2,500 or less may enter into an agreement with a
county to transfer to the county authority to approve or disapprove
a division. An application is complete if it contains information
necessary to ascertain whether the requirements of section 108 and
this section are met. The assessor or other municipally designated
official, or the county official, having authority to approve or
disapprove a proposed division, shall provide the person who filed
the application written notice whether the application is approved
or disapproved and, if disapproved, all the reasons for
disapproval. A complete application for a proposed division shall
be approved if, in addition to the requirements of section 108, all
of the following requirements are met:
(a) Each resulting parcel has an adequate and accurate legal
description and is included in a tentative parcel map showing area,
parcel lines, public utility easements, accessibility, and other
requirements of this section and section 108. The tentative parcel
map shall be a scale drawing showing the approximate dimensions of
the parcels.
(b) Each resulting parcel has a depth of not more than 4 times
the width or, if an ordinance referred to in subsection (5)
requires a smaller depth to width ratio, a depth to width ratio as
required by the ordinance. The municipality or county having
authority to review proposed divisions may allow a greater depth to
width ratio than that otherwise required by this subdivision or an
ordinance referred to in subsection (5). The greater depth to width
ratio shall be based on standards set forth in the ordinance
referred to in subsection (5). The standards may include, but are
not required to include and need not be limited to, exceptional
topographic or physical conditions with respect to the parcel and
compatibility with surrounding lands. The depth to width ratio
requirements of this subdivision do not apply to a parcel larger
than 10 acres, unless an ordinance referred to in subsection (5)
provides otherwise, and do not apply to the remainder of the parent
parcel or parent tract retained by the proprietor.
(c) Each resulting parcel has a width not less than that
required by an ordinance referred to in subsection (5).
(d) Each resulting parcel has an area not less than that
required by an ordinance referred to in subsection (5).
(e) Each resulting parcel, including any parcel that contains
a cemetery, is accessible.
(f) The division meets all of the requirements of section 108.
(g) Each resulting parcel that is a development site has
adequate easements for public utilities from the parcel to existing
public utility facilities.
(2) The right to make divisions exempt from the platting
requirements of this act under section 108 and this section can be
transferred, but only from a parent parcel or parent tract to a
parcel created from that parent parcel or parent tract. A
proprietor transferring the right to make a division pursuant to
this subsection shall within 45 days give written notice of the
transfer to the assessor of the city or township where the property
is located on the form prescribed by the state tax commission under
section 27a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL
211.27a. The state tax commission shall revise the form to include
substantially the following questions in the mandatory information
portion of the form:
(a) "Did the parent parcel or parent tract have any
unallocated divisions under the land division act, 1967 PA 288, MCL
560.101 to 560.293? If so, how many?"
(b) "Were any unallocated divisions transferred to the newly
created parcel? If so, how many?"
(3) A person shall not sell a parcel of unplatted land unless
the deed contains a statement as to whether the right to make
further divisions exempt from the platting requirements of this act
under this section and section 108 is proposed to be conveyed. The
statement shall be in substantially the following form: "The
grantor grants to the grantee the right to make [insert number]
division(s) under section 108 of the land division act, Act No. 288
of the Public Acts of 1967." In the absence of a statement
conforming to the requirements of this subsection, the right to
make divisions under section 108(2), (3), and (4) stays with the
remainder of the parent tract or parent parcel retained by the
grantor.
(4) All deeds for parcels of unplatted land within the state
of Michigan after the effective date of this act shall contain the
following statement: "This property may be located within the
vicinity of farm land or a farm operation. Generally accepted
agricultural and management practices which may generate noise,
dust, odors, and other associated conditions may be used and are
protected by the Michigan right to farm act.".
(5) The governing body of a municipality or the county board
of commissioners of a county having authority to approve or
disapprove a division may adopt an ordinance setting forth the
standards
in section 109(1)(b) subsection
(1)(b), (c), and (d). The
ordinance may establish a fee for reviews under this section and
section 108. The fee shall not exceed the reasonable costs of
providing the services for which the fee is charged.
(6) Approval of a division is not a determination that the
resulting parcels comply with other ordinances or regulations.
Sec. 182. (1) The governing body of a municipality in which
the subdivision is situated may require the following as a
condition of approval of final plat, for all public and private
streets, alleys and roads in its jurisdiction:
(a) Conformance to the general plan, width and location
requirements that it may have adopted and published, and greater
width than shown on a county or state plan, but may not require
conformance to a municipal plan that conflicts with a general plan
adopted by the county or state for the location and width of
certain streets, roads, and highways.
(b) Proper drainage, grading, and construction of approved
materials of a thickness and width provided in its current
published construction standards.
(c)
Installation of bridges and culverts where it deems
considers necessary.
(d) Submission of complete plans for grading, drainage, and
construction to be prepared and sealed by a civil engineer
registered in the state.
(e) Completion of all required improvements relative to
streets, alleys, and roads or a deposit by the proprietor with the
clerk of the municipality in the form of cash, a certified check,
or irrevocable bank letter of credit, whichever the proprietor
selects, or a surety bond acceptable to the governing body, in an
amount sufficient to insure completion within the time specified.
(2) As a condition of approval of the plat, the governing body
may require a deposit to be made in the same manner as provided in
subdivision
(e) of subsection (1) (1)(e),
to insure performance of
any of the obligations of the proprietor to make required
improvements.
(3) The governing body shall rebate to the proprietor, as the
work progresses, amounts of any cash deposits equal to the ratio of
the work completed to the entire project.
(4) The governing body shall reject a plat in any of the
following circumstances:
(a)
Reject a The plat which is isolated from or which isolates
other lands, including any land that contains a cemetery, from
existing public streets, unless suitable access is provided.
(b)
Reject a The plat showing shows a street or road name
duplicating one already in use in the municipality, except in
continuing a street or road.
(c)
Reject a The plat showing shows the name of a new
street,
alley, or road that is so similar to the one already in existence
in
the municipality that permitting such that use in the
subdivision may be confusing for purposes of assessing, mail
delivery, and locating by the public.