Bill Text: NY S06852 | 2021-2022 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Establishes criteria for the sale of automated employment decision tools and provides a civil penalty for violations of such criteria.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2022-01-05 - REFERRED TO LABOR [S06852 Detail]

Download: New_York-2021-S06852-Introduced.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          6852

                               2021-2022 Regular Sessions

                    IN SENATE

                                      May 19, 2021
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by  Sen.  RAMOS  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor

        AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to establishing criteria  for
          the sale of automated employment decision tools

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. The labor law is amended by adding a new section  203-f  to
     2  read as follows:
     3    §  203-f. Sale of automated employment decision tools. 1. For purposes
     4  of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
     5    a. "Automated employment decision  tool"  means  any  system  used  to
     6  filter employment candidates or prospective candidates for hire in a way
     7  that  establishes a preferred candidate or candidates without relying on
     8  candidate-specific assessments by individual decision-makers.  Automated
     9  employment  decision  tools  shall  include personality tests, cognitive
    10  ability tests, resume scoring systems and any system whose  function  is
    11  governed  by statistical theory, or whose parameters are defined by such
    12  systems, including inferential methodologies, linear regression,  neural
    13  networks, decision trees, random forests and other learning algorithms.
    14    b.  "Disparate  impact  report"  means  an analysis, including but not
    15  limited to testing, of the extent to which use of an  automated  employ-
    16  ment  decision  tool  is  likely  to  result in an adverse impact to the
    17  detriment of any group on the basis of sex, race or ethnicity. A  dispa-
    18  rate  impact  report  shall  differentiate  between  candidates who were
    19  selected and candidates who were not selected  by  the  tool  and  shall
    20  include  a  disparate impact analysis as specified in the uniform guide-
    21  lines on employee selection procedures promulgated by the United  States
    22  equal employment opportunity commission.
    23    c.  "Disability  accommodation policy" means an overview of the proce-
    24  dures an automated employment decision tool relies  on  to  ensure  that
    25  candidates  with  disabilities  can receive reasonable accommodations in

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD10862-01-1

        S. 6852                             2

     1  the hiring process in accordance with the  Americans  with  Disabilities
     2  Act of 1990, as amended (Public Law 101-336).
     3    d. "Employment decision" means to screen candidates for employment.
     4    2. It shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale an automated employ-
     5  ment decision tool that fails to comply with the following provisions:
     6    a.  A disparate impact report shall be conducted one year prior to the
     7  sale or the offering for sale of an automated employment decision  tool.
     8  A  public  disclosure report shall be provided to the department no less
     9  than annually and shall include the results of the most recent disparate
    10  impact report for each automated employment decision tool available  for
    11  sale  in the state. Such report shall also include the disability accom-
    12  modation policy of the vendor.
    13    b. Every sale of such tool shall include a copy  of  the  most  recent
    14  public disclosure report at no additional cost.
    15    c.  No less than annually, a disparate impact report shall be produced
    16  to assess the actual impact of any automated  employment  decision  tool
    17  used  by  any  employer  to select candidates for jobs within the state.
    18  Such disparate impact report shall be provided to the employer but shall
    19  not be publicly filed and shall be subject to all applicable privileges.
    20    d. Such tool shall be sold or offered for sale with a  notice  stating
    21  that such tool is subject to the provisions of this section.
    22    3. A person who uses an automated employment decision tool to screen a
    23  candidate  for  an employment decision shall provide notice to each such
    24  candidate that an automated employment decision tool subject  to  dispa-
    25  rate  impact  reporting was used in connection with assessing the candi-
    26  date and shall notify each such candidate of the job  qualifications  or
    27  characteristics that such tool was used to assess.
    28    4.  a. A person who violates any provision of this section or any rule
    29  or regulation promulgated thereunder, shall be subject to a civil penal-
    30  ty of up to five hundred dollars for the first violation  and  for  each
    31  additional  violation  occurring on the same day as the first violation,
    32  and a civil penalty of not less than five hundred dollars, nor more than
    33  one thousand five hundred dollars, for each subsequent violation.
    34    b. Violations shall accrue on a daily basis for each automated employ-
    35  ment decision tool that is sold or offered  for  sale  in  violation  of
    36  subdivision two of this section.
    37    c.  Each instance in which notice is not provided to a candidate prior
    38  to the use of an automated employment decision  tool,  in  violation  of
    39  subdivision  three  of this section, shall constitute a single violation
    40  and each thirty day period  thereafter  in  which  such  notice  is  not
    41  provided to such candidate shall constitute a separate violation.
    42    5.  The  commissioner may initiate an investigation if a preponderance
    43  of the evidence establishes a suspicion of a  violation,  including  but
    44  not  limited  to,  mandating  a  third party disparate impact audit. The
    45  commissioner may also initiate in a court of competent jurisdiction  any
    46  action  or  proceeding  that  may  be  appropriate  or necessary for the
    47  correction of any violation issued pursuant to this  section,  including
    48  mandating  compliance  with the provisions of this section or such other
    49  relief as may be appropriate.
    50    6. The department may promulgate rules and  regulations  as  it  deems
    51  necessary  to effectuate the purposes of this section, on or before such
    52  effective date.
    53    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback