Bill Text: NY A03461 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Provides for an appointment of a guardian for personal needs or property management; provides that the order of appointment shall identify the persons entitled to receive notice of the incapacitated person's death, funeral arrangements, receive notice of the incapacitated person's transfer to a medical facility and persons entitled to visit such person.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 13-0)

Status: (Passed) 2016-07-21 - signed chap.98 [A03461 Detail]

Download: New_York-2015-A03461-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         3461
                              2015-2016 Regular Sessions
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                   January 23, 2015
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  MAGNARELLI  -- read once and referred to the
         Committee on Judiciary
       AN ACT to amend the mental hygiene law and the civil  practice  law  and
         rules, in relation to guardianship duties and visitation claims
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. subdivision (a) of section 81.20 of the mental hygiene  law
    2  is amended by adding a new paragraph 8 to read as follows:
    3    8. A GUARDIAN SHALL INFORM THE RELATIVES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
    4  THE CHILDREN, OF AN ELDER OR DEPENDENT INCAPACITATED ADULT WHENEVER THEY
    5  ARE  ADMITTED TO A MEDICAL FACILITY FOR ACUTE CARE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE
    6  DAYS OR MORE OR IN THE EVENT OF DEATH. IN THE CASE OF DEATH, THE GUARDI-
    7  AN SHALL INFORM THE  RELATIVES  OF  ANY  FUNERAL  ARRANGEMENTS  AND  THE
    8  LOCATION OF THE INCAPACITATED PERSON'S FINAL RESTING PLACE.
    9    S  2.  The article heading of article 12 of the civil practice law and
   10  rules, as amended by chapter 115 of the laws of 1981, is amended to read
   11  as follows:
   12                  INFANTS, INCOMPETENTS [AND], CONSERVATEES
   13                               AND THE ELDERLY
   14  S 3. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new section
   15  1212 to read as follows:
   16    S 1212. ELDERLY VISITATION CLAIMS. (A) PETITION TO THE SUPREME  COURT.
   17  A  PETITION MAY BE BROUGHT FOR A VISITATION ORDER TO ENJOIN A RESPONDENT
   18  FROM KEEPING A PROPOSED VISITEE IN ISOLATION FROM CONTACT WITH THE PETI-
   19  TIONER.
   20    (B) DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
   21    1. "ELDER" SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEANING AS PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION
   22  ONE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED FOURTEEN OF THE ELDER LAW.
   23    2. "DEPENDENT ADULT" SHALL MEAN ANY PERSON BETWEEN THE AGES  OF  EIGH-
   24  TEEN  AND SIXTY WHO RESIDES IN THIS STATE AND WHO HAS PHYSICAL OR MENTAL
   25  LIMITATIONS THAT RESTRICT HIS OR HER ABILITY TO CARRY OUT NORMAL  ACTIV-
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD07225-01-5
       A. 3461                             2
    1  ITIES  OR  TO  PROTECT HIS OR HER RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
    2  PERSONS WHO HAVE PHYSICAL OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, OR WHOSE  PHYS-
    3  ICAL OR MENTAL ABILITIES HAVE DIMINISHED BECAUSE OF AGE.
    4    3. "ISOLATION" SHALL MEAN:
    5    (I)  ACTS  INTENTIONALLY  COMMITTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING, AND
    6  THAT DO SERVE TO PREVENT, AN ELDER OR DEPENDENT ADULT FROM RECEIVING HIS
    7  OR HER MAIL OR TELEPHONE CALLS.
    8    (II) TELLING A CALLER OR PROSPECTIVE VISITOR THAT AN ELDER OR  DEPEND-
    9  ENT  ADULT  IS NOT PRESENT, OR DOES NOT WISH TO TALK WITH THE CALLER, OR
   10  DOES NOT WISH TO MEET WITH THE VISITOR WHERE THE STATEMENT IS FALSE,  IS
   11  CONTRARY  TO  THE  EXPRESS  WISHES  OF THE ELDER OR THE DEPENDENT ADULT,
   12  WHETHER HE OR SHE IS COMPETENT OR NOT, AND IS MADE FOR  THE  PURPOSE  OF
   13  PREVENTING THE ELDER OR DEPENDENT ADULT FROM HAVING CONTACT WITH FAMILY,
   14  FRIENDS, OR CONCERNED PERSONS.
   15    (III)  PHYSICAL  RESTRAINT  OF  AN  ELDER  OR DEPENDENT ADULT, FOR THE
   16  PURPOSE OF PREVENTING THE ELDER OR DEPENDENT  ADULT  FROM  MEETING  WITH
   17  VISITORS.
   18    4."PETITIONER"  SHALL  MEAN  A  PERSON  WHO IS A RELATIVE IN THE FIRST
   19  DEGREE OF THE PROPOSED VISITEE.
   20    5. "PROPOSED VISITEE" SHALL MEAN THE ELDER OR DEPENDENT ADULT, WHO  IS
   21  UNDER  THE  CARE  OR  CUSTODY  OF THE RESPONDENT, TO BE PROTECTED BY THE
   22  VISITATION ORDER AND, IF THE COURT GRANTS THE  PETITION,  THE  PROTECTED
   23  PERSON.
   24    6.  "RESPONDENT"  SHALL MEAN THE PERSON WHO IS ALLEGED TO BE ISOLATING
   25  THE PROPOSED VISITEE, AND IF THE PETITION  IS  GRANTED,  THE  RESTRAINED
   26  PERSON.
   27    7.  "VISITATION"  SHALL  MEAN ANY IN-PERSON MEETING BETWEEN A PROPOSED
   28  VISITEE AND THE PETITIONER.
   29    8. "VISITATION ORDER" SHALL MEAN AN ORDER ENJOINING A PARTY FROM KEEP-
   30  ING THE PROPOSED VISITEE IN ISOLATION FROM CONTACT WITH  THE  PETITIONER
   31  THAT IS ISSUED BY A COURT AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING.
   32    (C)  ORDER.  1.  AN ORDER MAY BE ISSUED UNDER THIS SECTION TO RESTRAIN
   33  THE RESPONDENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING A RECURRENCE  OF  ISOLATION
   34  IF  THE  PETITIONER HAS SHOWN BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, TO THE
   35  SATISFACTION OF THE COURT, REASONABLE PROOF OF A PAST  ACT  OR  ACTS  OF
   36  ISOLATION  OF THE PROPOSED VISITEE FROM CONTACT WITH THE PETITIONER, AND
   37  UPON A SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED VISITEE DESIRES CONTACT WITH THE  PETI-
   38  TIONER OR THAT VISITATION IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PROPOSED VISI-
   39  TEE.
   40    2.  THE  ORDER MAY SPECIFY THE FREQUENCY, TIME, PLACE, AND LOCATION OF
   41  VISITATION.
   42    3. IN DECIDING WHETHER VISITATION WITH THE PETITIONER IS IN  THE  BEST
   43  INTEREST OF THE PROPOSED VISITEE THE COURT MAY CONSIDER WHETHER THE BEST
   44  INTEREST  OF  THE  PROPOSED  VISITEE REQUIRES THAT ANY VISITATION BY THE
   45  PETITIONER BE LIMITED TO SITUATIONS IN WHICH A THIRD  PERSON,  SPECIFIED
   46  BY  THE  COURT,  IS PRESENT, OR WHETHER VISITATION SHALL BE SUSPENDED OR
   47  DENIED. THE PETITIONER, PROPOSED VISITEE, OR RESPONDENT  MAY  SUBMIT  TO
   48  THE  COURT THE NAME OF A PERSON WHO MAY BE SUITABLE TO BE PRESENT DURING
   49  VISITATION.
   50    4. IN DECIDING WHETHER VISITATION WITH THE PETITIONER IS IN  THE  BEST
   51  INTEREST  OF  THE  PROPOSED  VISITEE, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER ANY PRIOR
   52  PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED AGAINST THE PETITIONER.
   53    5. THE COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE AN ORDER UNLESS THE PROPOSED VISITEE  HAS
   54  EXPRESSED  A DESIRE FOR VISITATION. THE COURT MAY APPOINT A COURT INVES-
   55  TIGATOR TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PROPOSED VISITEE HAS EXPRESSED A DESIRE
   56  FOR VISITATION.
       A. 3461                             3
    1    6. THE COURT SHALL ISSUE AN ORDER ONLY  AFTER  NOTICE  AND  A  HEARING
    2  UNDER  THIS  SECTION,  AND  THE  COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE AN EX PARTE ORDER
    3  UNDER THIS SECTION.
    4    7.  IN THE DISCRETION OF THE COURT, AN ORDER ISSUED AFTER NOTICE AND A
    5  HEARING UNDER THIS SECTION MAY HAVE A DURATION OF  NOT  MORE  THAN  FIVE
    6  YEARS,  SUBJECT  TO  TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION BY FURTHER ORDER OF THE
    7  COURT EITHER ON WRITTEN STIPULATION FILED  WITH  THE  COURT  OR  ON  THE
    8  MOTION  OF  A  PARTY. THESE ORDERS MAY BE RENEWED, UPON THE REQUEST OF A
    9  PARTY, EITHER FOR FIVE YEARS OR PERMANENTLY, WITHOUT A  SHOWING  OF  ANY
   10  FURTHER  ISOLATION  SINCE THE ISSUANCE OF THE ORIGINAL ORDER, SUBJECT TO
   11  TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION BY FURTHER ORDER  OF  THE  COURT  EITHER  ON
   12  WRITTEN  STIPULATION  FILED  WITH THE COURT OR ON THE MOTION OF A PARTY.
   13  THE REQUEST FOR RENEWAL MAY BE BROUGHT AT  ANY  TIME  WITHIN  THE  THREE
   14  MONTHS  BEFORE  THE  EXPIRATION  OF THE ORDERS. THE FAILURE TO STATE THE
   15  EXPIRATION DATE ON THE FACE OF THE FORM CREATES AN ORDER WITH A DURATION
   16  OF THREE YEARS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE.
   17    (D) REPRESENTATION/APPEARANCE. THE  COURT  MAY  REQUIRE  THE  PROPOSED
   18  VISITEE, OR THE PROPOSED VISITEE'S ATTORNEY TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING. IF
   19  THE  PROPOSED VISITEE DOES NOT HAVE AN ATTORNEY, THE COURT SHALL APPOINT
   20  AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THE PROPOSED VISITEE'S INTERESTS.
   21    (E) THE COURT SHALL SCHEDULE AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING WITHIN SIXTY  DAYS
   22  FROM  THE DATE THAT THE PETITION IS FILED. THE COURT MAY GRANT A CONTIN-
   23  UANCE OF THE HEARING FOR GOOD CAUSE.
   24    (F) THE RESPONDENT AND THE PROPOSED VISITEE SHALL EACH  BE  PERSONALLY
   25  SERVED  WITH  A  COPY OF THE PETITION FOR VISITATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF
   26  THE HEARING AT LAST TWENTY-ONE DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING DATE.
   27    (G) THE NOTICE OF THE HEARING SHALL NOTIFY THE  PROPOSED  VISITEE  AND
   28  THE RESPONDENT THAT FOLLOWING THE HEARING, THE COURT MAY MAKE ORDERS NOT
   29  TO  EXCEED  FIVE  YEARS FROM THE HEARING DATE. THE NOTICE OF THE HEARING
   30  SHALL ALSO NOTIFY THE PROPOSED VISITEE WHETHER THE COURT  REQUIRES  THAT
   31  THE  PROPOSED  VISITEE  APPEAR  AT  THE HEARING, AND HOW TO REQUEST THAT
   32  COUNSEL BE APPOINTED IF THE PROPOSED VISITEE IS UNABLE TO  RETAIN  COUN-
   33  SEL.
   34    (H)  THE  RESPONDENT  MAY  FILE  AND SERVE A RESPONSE THAT EXPLAINS OR
   35  DENIES THE ALLEGED ISOLATION AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING DATE.
   36    (I) THE COURT MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION, AWARD THE  PREVAILING  PARTY  IN
   37  ANY  ACTION  BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES,
   38  IF ANY. IN NO EVENT, SHALL THE PROPOSED VISITEE BY REQUIRED TO  PAY  THE
   39  COURT  COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES OF EITHER THE PREVAILING OR NON-PREVAIL-
   40  ING PARTY.
   41    S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback